Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:27:04 -0400, "Bob" wrote:
Hi all I have it back up without the balun, and still have to use the coax for now. I am able to tune it now on all bands but I am sure there is a lot of power loss from the tuner. I grounded out all devices in the shack but still receiving a lot of RF interferrence on tv, computer, and home alarm. Thanks for all the advice, really appreciate it. Hi Bob, Unfortunately you have proven that the BalUn was very effective in doing what it is designed to do - prevent all the problems you have now inherited from those who blamed your coax. Mikes suggestion was the best - fix the antenna. The golden rule of consulting is to give the customer advice they can perform. You are limited to coax and they all had twin lead answers. Mike's suggestion of making multiple dipoles AKA fan dipole is the simplest and quickest (just make sure that you drop the ends away from each run by one to two feet - the fan). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? | Antenna | |||
shortened dipole loaded | Antenna | |||
10m dipole and tuner | Antenna |