Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:39:19 -0600, tom wrote: On the other hand the null for this antenna array would need to be maybe 90dB or better to be really useful. Here we have three (3) antennas, and as we all know they are not in isolation. Somewhere, there's a nearby (or near enough) overlooked reflective surface that disrupts that oh-so-absolutely-necessary symmetry. All practical systems like this use some form of adaptive logic to fix that. Usually, adaptive canceling is done in the receiver, because the signal levels are lower, but in the 802.11 kind of world, with 100mW linear transmitters, there's probably not much cost difference. A different matter if you're running a kilowatt. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) No Comment | Shortwave | |||
DRM in the USA: a comment | Broadcasting | |||
eBay comment | Swap | |||
Pls comment on this dipole | Antenna | |||
Comment By Optoelectronics | Scanner |