Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 mar, 16:38, John - KD5YI wrote:
On 3/21/2011 7:06 AM, Wimpie wrote: On 21 mar, 00:42, John - *wrote: On 3/20/2011 5:11 PM, Wimpie wrote: On 20 mar, 21:09, * *wrote: On Mar 19, 5:59 pm, * *wrote: On 19 mar, 22:25, * *wrote: I was palnning on building a 2M Yagi this weekend and was wondering if my available bill of materials would have a significant effect on normal design parameters. The plan is to use 3/4 inch EMT conduit for the boom and 3/8 inch all-thread for the elements. My concern was that the threads could change the design frequency. JImmie Hello Jimmie, I think it will be OK, but if you want to be 100% sure, make a dipole of same thickness tubing and one from the threaded material of choice. If results are same, you can use it without dimension scaling. *Are you using galvanized or alu material? If required, apply some corrosion protection. With kind regards, Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl . Galvanized, The pupose was to demostrate *that materials can often be adlib and still have a useable antenna. Maybe this one will not last 30 years before it corrodes away but probably 5 or 6. Also I want to demonstrate the value of using a jig when building many antennas all made the same. I have tried the test you mention on 10 meters before replacing a vertical mounted on my truck. Changing materials didn't seem to make much difference. WIll *try the same for 2M but I dont have an SWR meter for 2M at this time.. Was hopng someone in the group might think this interesing enough to try. Jimmie Hello Jimmie Zinc has about 60% conductivity of alu alloys that are used for antennas, so the surface resistance will be almost 80% of alu tubing (same diameter). *Of course you have thread that increases the path length. Given the thread, your net conductivity will be about 40% (w.r.t. alu). This will be OK for doing your experiments and to demonstrate that you can use many materials for antennas. I would recommend you to find some means to determine VSWR (or refl. coeff.) at 2m (home made slotted coaxial line, or home brew coupler?). With kind regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl Without abc, PM will reach me Here is one the OP can build: http://www.qsl.net/xq2fod/Electron/swr/swr.html Hello John, I made (and still use) same type of wheatstone bridge refl. coeff. meter with BAT15 diodes (so only low power) and 0805 SMD. Instead of a moving coil indicator I used a 10 MOhm DVM (to get better linearity at low power input). That's a great idea. I wish I had thought of that. John Hello John, Jimmie and others, If the DC input resistance of the DVM is very large compared to the zero bias differential resistance of the diode, there is a tight relation between DC output voltage and the RF input voltage with reasonable temperature behavior. If you measure the RF to DC curve at about 5 RF input levels (at say 10 MHz, just with an oscilloscope and simple RF signal source), you can make a curve fitted table/graph to handle the linear to quadratic transition at around 150mV RF peak voltage. This enables you to convert DC output to RF input voltage. You can expect about 1mV DC from a real schottky diode for 10mVp RF input voltage (across the diode junction). Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl without abc, PM will reach me |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Serious Skin Care Tips For Women Who Take Their Skin Care Seriously! | Antenna | |||
End effect, velocity propagation question | Antenna | |||
skin effect | Antenna | |||
skin effect | Antenna |