Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:31:17 -0500, amdx wrote:
Sounds like you didn't look at the site so "what is left unsaid." Hi Mike, As I said, nothing there but a vague suggestion of the topic heavily cloaked in an admonition. Yes, I'm looking a steerable receive only arrays for the AM broadcast band. Myself, I want one that will fit on a 150ft lot. Is that 150' on a side? 150' long? There are any number of ways to construct variable delay lines. A little bit of computer control will pull their outputs together to form beam steering. Planting the antennas is simple and allows for testing of any of those many ways to construct variable delay lines. Those designs themselves have various trade-offs for issues you need to prioritize and pronounce. The antennas don't need to be in any particular, regular pattern as that would be accommodated by computer alignment. If you choose to go manual steering, with analog variable delay line designs; then, yes, having a regular pattern of element layout would reduce complexity. How many antenna elements? At least three, I would suspect. From there on it is a matter of how well you can resolve the various delay angles for steering a broad beam angle. Increase the number of elements and the beam angle gets progressively tighter. You don't say how much directionality you want, but it will be intimately correlated with this count. The delay lines will have to be tolerant of mutual coupling - better yet, they should not perturb the existing mutual coupling at all. Good isolation amplifiers between each element and its delay line before going to a summing amplifier would seem a solution. Tracking between delay lines will affect beam width. More elements will require tighter tracking. Then there is something simpler, an Adcock Antenna and the Bellini Tosi Antenna (about 100 years old, but does the job too). There is the Krug (Wullenweber) antenna. They are all symmetrical designs that simplified the manual, analog delay lines design. In the end, they all comprise the same fundamentals. If you cannot support a symmetrical design, that is your primary limiting factor. If you can digitize the delay lines, then symmetry can be synthesized and the antennas can be placed physically anywhere limited only by the resolution of digital sampling rate. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Dallas Files | Antenna | |||
dallas, TX freqs | Scanner | |||
FS: FOR DALLAS TEXAS ONLY | Boatanchors | |||
Shortwave Dealer In Dallas, TX | Shortwave | |||
.EZ files to .N4W files conversion | Antenna |