Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:51:15 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: 'Doc wrote: Hey Cecil, 4% is better than 2%, and a 'hunerd'% increase in efficiency! (I agree with you anyway...) A 2% efficient radiator and a 2% efficient counterpoise doesn't add up to 4% total efficiency. :-) Anyone who wants a portable rotatable dipole on 75m can do much, much better than two Hustlers. Two SD-20 poles with high-Q loading coils in the middle of each comes to mind. And that's not much more trouble than two Hustlers. The SD-20 approach is available at http://www.wr6w6.com The question was the length of a counterpoise, not a rotatable dipole. I figured another Hustler sure beats running radials out in a portable situation. If someone was to ask you how to make their Chevy run better would you tell him to get a Ford? ;-) Ron |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
mobile antenna impedance comparison | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Mobile Antenna Question | Antenna |