Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 10th 04, 01:24 PM
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave,

I didn't come here to fence with you guys. I know nothing about the
relative efficiency of antenna systems.

You could be right and the effiency of a tuned dipole "may" be 2%,
which in my mind means if it were replaced with a regular dipole, the
signal strength at a remote location would increase 50 times, but that
certainly cannot be determined that with that brand of math.

Sorry,

Ron

On Mon, 10 May 2004 00:20:55 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote:

Ron wrote:

On Sun, 09 May 2004 17:26:05 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote:

SNIP

So you can use the formula I^2*R (which is for finding P) without
knowing the variable "I" to find the resistance (Ra)?

I don't think so. Unless you have a magic wand, Harry Potter :-)

Ron


You certainly can!!

Total power to the antenna SYSTEM = I^2*(Rr + Ra + Rg).

Total power radiated = I^2*(Rr).

When you divide the two terms to get efficiency the I^2 term cancels.
This leaves Rr/(Rr + Ra + Rg). The current terms drops right out!!

DD


  #2   Report Post  
Old May 10th 04, 01:41 PM
Dave Shrader
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes it can! Gain improvement = 10*Log{50) = +16 dB or about 3 S-units.

Ron wrote:

Dave,

I didn't come here to fence with you guys. I know nothing about the
relative efficiency of antenna systems.

You could be right and the effiency of a tuned dipole "may" be 2%,
which in my mind means if it were replaced with a regular dipole, the
signal strength at a remote location would increase 50 times, but that
certainly cannot be determined that with that brand of math.

Sorry,

Ron

On Mon, 10 May 2004 00:20:55 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote:


Ron wrote:


On Sun, 09 May 2004 17:26:05 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote:


SNIP

So you can use the formula I^2*R (which is for finding P) without
knowing the variable "I" to find the resistance (Ra)?

I don't think so. Unless you have a magic wand, Harry Potter :-)

Ron


You certainly can!!

Total power to the antenna SYSTEM = I^2*(Rr + Ra + Rg).

Total power radiated = I^2*(Rr).

When you divide the two terms to get efficiency the I^2 term cancels.
This leaves Rr/(Rr + Ra + Rg). The current terms drops right out!!

DD




  #3   Report Post  
Old May 10th 04, 10:28 PM
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 10 May 2004 11:41:10 GMT, Dave Shrader
wrote:

Yes it can! Gain improvement = 10*Log{50) = +16 dB or about 3 S-units.


I already gave up. You know more about the subject than me.

Just a question, is W1MCE your original call?

Ron W1WBV (1952)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
mobile antenna impedance comparison H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H Antenna 23 January 22nd 04 11:32 AM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 05:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
Mobile Antenna Question Richard Clark Antenna 3 August 23rd 03 09:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017