Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/2/2011 1:37 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
You have a point Mark. I agree that a simple 1/4 wave groundplane is more study and very easy to make using an so-239 and some piano wire. Steel wire can be soldered right into the back, four bolts with nuts and four more peaces of wire around 19" long with a bit of a downward bend and you have a very good antenna. It's worth noting that you don't actually need four radials. Two radials (on opposite sides of the feedpoint, bent down at around 45 degrees) will produce a perfectly satisfactory ground-plane. The patterns of 2- and 4-radial ground plane antennas are almost indistinguishable. A 4-radial antenna may *look* as if it would produce a much more circular pattern than a 2-radial antenna, but this doesn't turn out to actually be the case. That's true as far as the pattern. But.. The more radials you use, the better the decoupling from the feed line. Most of my 1/4 wave GP's actually use 6-8 radials. I've done tests, and it does make a difference. But for casual use, what you say is true. Only two radials are required to get a pretty good omni pattern. Or one, if vertical.. But then you might as well call it a 1/2 wave vertical instead of a ground plane. And you will then require some kind of decoupling scheme below the vertical for optimum results. I prefer radial sets, cones, etc vs feed line chokes. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
J pole question | Antenna | |||
J pole question | Antenna | |||
J-Pole Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
J pole question | Antenna | |||
ladder line J-pole question | Antenna |