Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
In open competition between an Amateur and the professional fractal builder, the professional lost against 6 designs that trounced the best professional fractal on the basis of gain for the smallest footprint. That is to say, all seven antennas were bound within a prescribed "small" area (such as you describe), and the fractal came in dead last. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Sorry, I've had a little accident while sporting and since I've only a quick connection at the QRL, I couldn't check my mail and this newsgroup. OK, thanx for the explanation. It seems I can leave it now! I thought it would be a nice solution: a big amount of wire on a small area. But if performance is even lower as other antennas and I can only come out on QRP (I've got an FT-817) it is probably not the thing to choose for in first instance. Thanks all for the replies, links, etc. !! 73's de Jan, ON5DOA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |