Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
k4wge wrote:
An 18 page paper entitled FRACTAL ANTENNAS Introduction to fractal technology and presentation of a fractal antenna adaptable to anytransmitting frequency - The "FRACTENT" By Werner Hödlmayr, DL6NDJ January 2004 Can be downloaded at www.antenneX.com in fact, that was the article that raised all the questions ;-) I found it interesting, but wanted to know if hams are really using it! Kind regards, Jan, ON5DOA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jan Van Belle wrote in message ...
I found it interesting, but wanted to know if hams are really using it! Kind regards, Jan, ON5DOA Have you looked at the W0FMS page at http://www.fredspinner.com/W0FMS/fractant/ Fred says, "The purpose of this web page is to further explain the details of the rather contraversial Fractal Antenna. This antenna uses a fractal shape to load a radiating element, allowing, according to Nathan (Chip) Cohen, N1IR 2x to 4x reduction in size with little loss in gain and/or F/B. I haven't tried this antenna yet, which is patent pending from Fractal Antenna Systems, Inc. (Fractenna), so I claim nothing else than to have deciphered the (IMHO) rather cryptic building instructions in the http://www.fractenna.com/ham/hampage1.html page describing a 10-m 2 element quad fractal antenna. In order to avoid potental criticism, I am stating for the record that the instructions on the site are adequate for assembling this antenna. I am also stating that for most, it is very hard to understand these directions without a starting point of reference. It took me a couple of hours to figure it out, and I'm a EE... " |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
in fact, that was the article that raised all the questions ;-)
I found it interesting, but wanted to know if hams are really using it! Kind regards, Jan, ON5DOA Not to my knowledge, Jan. The presently and easily available (that is, free) info on fractal antennas for hams is poor in content and often factually inaccurate, in my opinion, and this is likely to remain so. In the world we live in today, this makes a lot of a sense in its own quirky fashion. Commercial uses are a different story, however. Of course, that's not what this NG is about. When hams switch to software radios in a big way then fractal antennas targeted to hams might be worth making more widely known. With some luck, they'll be a few of us 'hams' left then! 73, Chip N1IR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fractenna wrote:
When hams switch to software radios in a big way then fractal antennas targeted to hams might be worth making more widely known. With some luck, they'll be a few of us 'hams' left then! Maybe this is a naive question, but how does an antenna, fractal or otherwise, know what kind of transmitter is driving it? Why are software radios more suited to this design? vy 73 Andy, M1EBV |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe this is a naive question, but how does an antenna, fractal or
otherwise, know what kind of transmitter is driving it? Why are software radios more suited to this design? vy 73 Andy, M1EBV True frequency and waveform agility is the goal in SDR . Wideband, or controlled multiband, is needed. Ham requirements are well met at present with a variety of antenna designs that are nearly periodic in a fairly narrow frequency coverage, a fairly easy problem to solve. 73, Chip N1iR |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.
"Fractenna" wrote in message news:20040609122135.15248.00000404@mb- True frequency and waveform agility is the goal in SDR . Wideband, or controlled multiband, is needed. Ham requirements are well met at present with a variety of antenna designs that are nearly periodic in a fairly narrow frequency coverage, a fairly easy problem to solve. 73, Chip N1iR |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW"
wrote: Translation: fractured antennas are horse****. Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL!
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW" wrote: Translation: fractured antennas are horse****. Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Richard Clark
writes On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW" wrote: Translation: fractured antennas are horse****. Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-) Not a good analogy. Horse**** can be quite useful (ask any organic gardener). Ian. -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |