Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 30th 11, 08:13 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 801
Default Chinese duplexers

On 8/30/2011 11:14 AM, Rob wrote:
Jim wrote:
Any reason why you're using a split of 600kHz? Why not go to a
non-standard split to make life easier. Pick two frequencies 3 MHz apart
(assuming you can get them coordinated, which is more a political than a
technical issue)


Don't forget that in Region 1, the 2M band is only 2 MHz wide, the
bottom 500 kHz is dedicated to SSB and the top 200 kHz is for satellite.


Sure, that does make it harder. The OP is in region 2, though, where
there's 4 MHz theoretically available)

flame protective suit on And of course, a lot of the band plans are
basically gentlemen's agreements and have no force of law. As long as
you don't interfere with someone (challenging in some geographical
locations), you can pretty much do what you want.flame suit off

I wouldn't want to put input or output on 144.2, for instance.

But looking at the ARRL band plan, you could put your input up at
147.6-147.99 and put your output at 145.5-145.8 (Misc and experimental,
per ARRL).. not quite 3 MHz, but close, and a whole lot better than 600kHz.

Here in the Los Angeles area, either TASMA or the anti-TASMA folks would
probably round up people to have you tarred, feathered and run out of
town on a rail, no matter what you do. In any case, things move so
slowly that unless you were hideously inconsiderate and egregiously
interfering, you could probably run for a year or more before it would
get too nasty.

There is a 147.585/144.930 pair labeled for "portable repeater" in the
TASMA plan (max 72 hrs/month).. that's 2.5 MHz apart (to make filtering
easier). They also say 144.310-144.375 is for simplex unchannelized,
but I've not heard much on the air there..for an experiment, it would
probably work.



  #2   Report Post  
Old August 30th 11, 09:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 375
Default Chinese duplexers

Jim Lux wrote:
On 8/30/2011 11:14 AM, Rob wrote:
Jim wrote:
Any reason why you're using a split of 600kHz? Why not go to a
non-standard split to make life easier. Pick two frequencies 3 MHz apart
(assuming you can get them coordinated, which is more a political than a
technical issue)


Don't forget that in Region 1, the 2M band is only 2 MHz wide, the
bottom 500 kHz is dedicated to SSB and the top 200 kHz is for satellite.


Sure, that does make it harder. The OP is in region 2, though, where
there's 4 MHz theoretically available)


I think he is in Region 1. He posts with 2 callsigns, one is a 4X1
(Israel) and mentions:

but my 2m band is only 144-146
mHz, and the repeater portion is really just 145-146.

flame protective suit on And of course, a lot of the band plans are
basically gentlemen's agreements and have no force of law. As long as
you don't interfere with someone (challenging in some geographical
locations), you can pretty much do what you want.flame suit off


Sure, but to get a permit for unattended operation, at least over here,
you'll need to abide to the band plans.

(in fact in my country, Netherlands, it is even worse: the repeater
frequencies are not coordinated by the ham community itself, but by
the equivalent of the FCC. they work strictly by a set of rules
originally drafted by the amateur societies, in the days the bands
were still overcrowded. arbitrary figures were put in those rules
regarding things like minimal desirable distance between repeaters,
maximum height of antennas, maximum EIRP power, that were originally
just there to regulate the inflow of new repeater projects a bit, so
everyone would have a fair chance of running a repeater. if you were
a few km too close, had an antenna a bit high, or similar, it usually
wasn't a problem. but one day an amateur who got refused a license
went to court claiming that others had gotten a license while not being
within the rules, and as a reaction the authority now strictly follows
the rules and refuses every application that does not fully conform to
all the rules. of course, operating on one of the reserved repeater
channels is one of the rules.)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Duplexers newcastle2way Swap 0 April 6th 08 08:12 PM
Duplexers SQ8GBJ Equipment 0 April 6th 04 07:59 PM
Duplexers SQ8GBJ Equipment 0 April 6th 04 07:59 PM
wtb: 900 Mhz duplexers [email protected] Swap 0 September 29th 03 10:40 PM
wtb: 2m duplexers Doug Swap 0 July 19th 03 05:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017