Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 18th 04, 05:23 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 18 May 2004 08:58:22 -0500, "Dave VanHorn"
wrote:

they are fractal,


Which then leads to one of many entries to this explicit topic found
in:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D9

Yes; I knew when I made rocks and trees into antennas I was going to get
some flack.

which served ego rather more than technical discussion.

This thread still remains as one of the most comic pieces published in
this group and worth reading the 59 entries. Where the comedy lapses
into technical content (rare), it provides specific information about
plants and RF interaction. I am glad to have run into specific
conductivities comparisons showing how the vaunted "conductivity" of
sea water is 200000 times worse than nichrome (or 10000000 times worse
than copper).

This one was not the only thread confined to this topic, but I would
wager all the rest amount to tedious repetition of the usual
population count of angels on a pin-head.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 19th 04, 03:56 AM
k4wge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 18 May 2004 08:58:22 -0500, "Dave VanHorn"
wrote:

they are fractal,


Which then leads to one of many entries to this explicit topic found
in:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D9

Yes; I knew when I made rocks and trees into antennas I was going to get
some flack.

which served ego rather more than technical discussion.

This thread still remains as one of the most comic pieces published in
this group and worth reading the 59 entries.



It may be the first time Cohen introduced "Jack", one of several of
the Fractal Personalities:

From: (Prozma)
Subject: YET ANOTHER BREAKTHROUGH ON TREES
Date: 1997/01/20
Message-ID: # 1/1
references:
organization: AOL
http://www.aol.com
newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna
x-admin:



Hello Chip;

I suggest you back off on this W8JITom fellow. He seems to make things
up
that you didn't say and refuses to try something as simple as knocking
a
nail into a tree. Perhaps he lacks the coax cable. I will turn the
filter
back on. Might do well for you to ignore all his responses as few seem
worthwhile.

People have been using trees for clandestine antennas since before
WWII.
As you point out it is not the best of antennas. For him to deny it is
at
least consistent for him.

As for your comment on libraries I heartily commend it. Everyone has
to
keep up if he is an engineer worth his salt. I remember going out of
my
way to get to Tech's library several times a year even when I lived
300
miles away.

Best to You and others here;

Jack
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 19th 04, 06:00 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 18 May 2004 19:56:34 -0700, (k4wge) wrote:
From:
(Prozma)
Ah Yes, the Mutt of the Mutt 'n' Jeff comedy act.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017