Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote I have a dipole hung from trees in my yard. I am going to lengthen my dipole by hanging more wire off the end. Will I be better off to run the wires to other trees, kind of creating a Z shape, or a C shape, or is it just as well to allow the ends to dangle? - Mike KB3EIA - ============================= Depending on how much longer your antenna will be, you may notice a modest improvement in signal strengths on the lowest frequency band. But you might notice a small decrease in signal strengths on the highest frequency band. On the other hand, you may notice nothing at all except a change in tuner settings. But a change in tuner settings can be beneficial. That is the main thing I am trying to do. The tuning is pretty sharp on 80-75 meters. (the dipole is 96 feet at present) It works okay, but since I am going to experiment with higher powers, it seemed like a more forgiving tuner environment might be a big plus. Plus of course not having to use as much inductance. I would prefer a Z or C shape. This maintains a high average height for the antenna and so increases the probabilty of improvement in signal strengths. Makes sense. The directions in which the ends are extended will have a slight effect on radiation patterns which you will NOT be aware of. As your dipole is non-rotatable it won't matter anyway. For practical purposes, taking one band with another, you can still refer your antenna as being omni-directional. Reciprocity ensures whatever happens on receive will apply equally to transmit. ---- Reg, G4FGQ Thanks much! - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
a dipole made of two great sheets of metal? | Antenna | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
Opinion: Dipoles | Antenna | |||
From multiband dipole to multiple monoband dipoles | Antenna | |||
Dipoles & Tuned Circuits | Antenna |