| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 16:40:05 -0700, "Just Another Opinion"
wrote: Well Thierry your advice is good for a 1/4 wave vertical -- but not a half wave end vertical. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Thierry's advise. As the subject of radials/counterpoise/ground is often either over engineered or under engineered (often to no apparent difference to the distant contact). It may complicate the tune, but it may also bring reward. Lookup the theory and you will see why. http://www.njqrp.org/n2cxantennas/halfer/ Hi OM, If someone wants to invest in the treatment that Thierry suggests, there is no down-side - this "theory" notwithstanding (which, by the way makes no effort to prohibit it, to its credit). Multiple radials also serve to decouple the feed line which then provides a more robust reference against which the antenna operates. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| cushcraft 17b2 information | Antenna | |||
| Anybody using Cushcraft D3 or D4? | Antenna | |||
| FS: Cushcraft MA5V Ham Radio Vertical antenna | Antenna | |||
| Info on Cushcraft R3 triband vertical | Antenna | |||
| Cushcraft MA5B problem | Antenna | |||