Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
of course it is against guidelines. you were starting a new thread without changing the subject. in effect hijacking the thread for your own discussion. Of course, it is not against the guidelines as the subject was "Reflected Power". I simply continued to talk about reflected power, the subject of the thread. That's a broad subject. Perhaps the originator erred in choosing that broad of a subject but he chose that subject nevertheless. All of my postings to this thread have been about reflected power, including this one, in defense of my postings about reflected power. i said it was real world, but it is not what the original thread was about. The original thread was about "Reflected Power". My example was about reflected power. I might not even have read the text of the original posting. It would be interesting to know why your agenda requires diverting the issue away from "reflected power"? What are you afraid of? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |