LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old May 28th 04, 05:48 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 27 May 2004 21:16:44 -0700, (alhearn) wrote:

If you read Chapter 13, "RF Power Amplifiers and Projects", in the
2004 ARRL Handbook, there are pages and pages of discussion of
matching plate or transistor output impedances to 50 ohms output


Hi Al,

Watch it, this is a heresy. ARRL is certainly not the end-all be-all
of design advice, but given these points are confirmed by professional
design guidelines and technical papers, one should be able to trust it
as a source written at a level suitable for amateur introduction.

and not once do they ever refer to output networks dissipating or
reflecting reflected power. Not once.


However, absence of discussion does not necessarily mean there is an
absence of concern.

It's always a matter of simply
matching one impedance to another to provide the highest power output
consistent with required linearity, while staying within the
amplifiying device's ratings.


Simple logic dictates as much.

Transmission lines have reflections; output matching networks and
tuners don't.


Simple logic does not allow this however. However, verifying this
property would be rather a challenge.

The reflections on transmission lines don't make it past
the end of the transmission line -- that's where the reflections take
place.


True, but only insofar as the tuner is adjusted to offer a conjugate.

Beyond the end of the transmission line, the reflections are
seen as mere impedances created by standing waves, which are created
by reflections, assuming mismatch.


Again, true after a fashion, but the distinction is only a matter of
point of view. Wave mechanics/lumped circuits give the same result.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo Dr. Slick Antenna 198 September 24th 03 06:19 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 08:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017