Richard said -
True, but only insofar as the tuner is adjusted to offer a conjugate.

================================
Richard, how many more times do I have to tell you? The impedance looking
back into the tuner is NOT the conjugate of the impedance looking into the
transmission line towards the antenna - not even when the tuner is adjusted
for SWR = 1-to-1.

You lead people astray.

Or did you make the assertion just to irritate yours truly?
----
Reg, G4FGQ

On Fri, 28 May 2004 05:37:07 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

Richard said -
True, but only insofar as the tuner is adjusted to offer a conjugate.

================================
Richard, how many more times do I have to tell you?

One wonders how many more times indeed, must be love.

You lead people astray.

Jealous?

Or did you make the assertion just to irritate yours truly?

oooooo!

88's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Seriously, ducky, do you have any numbers, or is this the Brit version
of foreplay?

Reg Edwards wrote:

Richard said -
True, but only insofar as the tuner is adjusted to offer a conjugate.

Richard, how many more times do I have to tell you? The impedance looking
back into the tuner is NOT the conjugate of the impedance looking into the
transmission line towards the antenna - not even when the tuner is adjusted
for SWR = 1-to-1.

Would you guys please define "conjugate". The following system is matched.
Is there a conjugate in there somewhere? To the right of the match point?

XMTR---50 ohm feedline---x---1/4WL 75 ohm feedline---112.5 ohm load
--
TNX & 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----