Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Owen Duffy" wrote in message ... "Ralph Mowery" wrote in : ... Way too much time and money is being wasted in the change over from the rg58 coax. Even with a 20 to 1 SWR the rg-58 will loose about 3 db of signal due to the large mismatch. The OP mentioned a 2.5m whip down to 40m. VSWR(50) of such a thing is likely to be around 1000 so your estimates of loss for VSWR(50) are not applicable to that scenario. (Estimating loss based on VSWR is prone to error in any event.) An NEC model suggests that feedpoint Z might be something like 10-j800. Taking that for example with 25' of RG58, line loss is more like 17dB. RG213 is better, but it does not solve the fundamental problem that R at the feedpoint is very low, and a large current is required to deliver power. Large currents contribute to high loss in feedlines. Owen The whole point was that going from rg-58 to rg-8 or the rg-213 or lmr-400 would not make hardly any differant. While the loss may be something like 17 db in the rg-58, it would still not be beter than 3 db going to another type of 50 ohm coax. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Idea suggestions for feedline routing. | General | |||
Feedline | Antenna | |||
50 ohm feedline to HQ-140-X | Boatanchors | |||
Buried feedline suggestions - Thanks | Antenna | |||
Buried feedline suggestions | Antenna |