Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Therein lies part of the problem with thinking that the unit (Joules/sec) moves along a transmission line. Energy in Joules moves. (Joules/sec) of power does not. What about the Poynting Vector and Power Flow Vectors? What about the 60 Hz "power generation" and "power distribution" system? Are you saying that the trailing edge of an ExH wave is not moving? Are you saying that the ExB power in the light from Alpha Centauri didn't come from Alpha Centauri? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: Therein lies part of the problem with thinking that the unit (Joules/sec) moves along a transmission line. Energy in Joules moves. (Joules/sec) of power does not. What about the Poynting Vector and Power Flow Vectors? What about them? What about the 60 Hz "power generation" and "power distribution" system? What are you trying to imply about power generation? "Power distribution system" is really a misnomer. In the present day venacular it would be called exactly what it is - an "energy distribution system". Are you saying that the trailing edge of an ExH wave is not moving? I don't recall ever expressing the opinion that traveling waves don't travel. However mathematical formulas do not propagate along transmission lines. Fields do, but there is no such thing as an ExB "field". 73, Jim AC6XG |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
... there is no such thing as an ExB "field". Good grief, Jim, ExB is proportional to the irradiance of a light beam. I'm sorry if my ASCII-limited character set hairlips you. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: ... there is no such thing as an ExB "field". Good grief, Jim, ExB is proportional to the irradiance of a light beam. Good grief, Cecil, irradiance isn't a field and doesn't propagates either! 73, Jim AC6XG |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:55:56 -0700, Jim Kelley
wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Good grief, Jim, ExB is proportional to the irradiance of a light beam. Good grief, Cecil, irradiance isn't a field and doesn't propagates either! Hi Jim, Nearly every posting that Cecil pens with his rustic understanding of Optics suffers from the obvious lack of experience. There is a certain amount of pretense in this irradiance (an archaic radiometric term used incorrectly for photometrics in an argument that calls for luminous flux), much like quoting I²R and not knowing what Ohms or Amperes are. He's lucky there are so very few that appreciate the gaffs of his unintended humor. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
Nearly every posting that Cecil pens with his rustic understanding of Optics suffers from the obvious lack of experience. Everything I write about light/optics comes straight from _Optics_, by Hecht. I assume he is more of an expert than you are and he uses the term "irradiance" for the power contained in a light beam. Hecht's interference equations involving irradiance are identical in concept to Dr. Best's power equations in his QEX article. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:11:55 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Everything I write about light/optics comes straight from A Xerox shows as much precision and no comprehension. Still enjoy the gaffs tho' Great show! ;-) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Good grief, Cecil, irradiance isn't a field and doesn't propagates either! As I said earlier, irradiance is proportional to the cross product of the E-field and B-field. Why do you think we call them fields if they are not fields? Exactly how does the irradiance from Alpha Centauri get to us without propagating? Methinks you are playing word games. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:59:02 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Exactly how does the irradiance from Alpha Centauri get to us without propagating? A smile a minute ;-) How does a money wire transfer get into your account without moving from the mint? [Hint to the literate: irradiance does not move, neither does the money in a wire transfer.] |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Clark wrote: On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:59:02 -0500, Cecil Moore wrote: Exactly how does the irradiance from Alpha Centauri get to us without propagating? A smile a minute ;-) How does a money wire transfer get into your account without moving from the mint? [Hint to the literate: irradiance does not move, neither does the money in a wire transfer.] Cecil says that a credit card is money, and presumably so is a wire transfer. All things are indeed, equal - apparently. Amazing analogy though - a power debit from one account, a power credit at the other - without power (or irradiance) having actually traveled the distance. All owing to the facility that transfers energy. 73, Jim AC6XG |