LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Report Post  
Old May 30th 12, 09:46 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 707
Default Hopefully not off topic


"Jeff Liebermann" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Tue, 29 May 2012 19:12:00 +0200, "Szczepan Bialek"
wrote:

" Inelectronic circuit theory, a "ground" is usually idealized as an
infinite source or sink for charge, which can absorb an unlimited amount
of
current without changing its potential. "


What does this have to do with measuring the weight change in an
antenna that allegedly is transmitting electrons? Electrons have
mass. Transmit enough of them and you'll loose mass. Receive enough
electrons, and your mythical antenna should gain mass.


Radio transmitter is an electron pump.
But without the "infinite source or sink for charge" it do not work.

Also, if the earth is absorbing your electrons, something should be
gaining a rather large positive charge as a result of the
transmission. Where is the positive charge?


Without the "infinite source or sink for charge" a transmitter is gaining a
rather large positive charge.

While we're at it, there are many ways to detect electrons. One of
them is with a phosophor screen, that will light up when hit by
electrons. Some how, waving my HT near the phosphor screen of my
oscilloscope fails to detect your alleged electrons. Could you
perhaps offer a better way to detect the electrons allegedly radiating
from an antenna?


Tesla made the electron beam and next the X-rays.

All antennas are grounded and you should be able to weigh the Earth
because
it gain and lose mass as they transmit and receive electrons"


I see. If I'm standing on the ground, I can't be weighed. Well, my
bathroom scale is sitting on the ground and works just fine measuring
my weight.

My HT antenna isn't grounded. Neither are any of the dipoles on my
roof. I presume you're suggesting that they don't work.


They are connected to the mass (chassis).

Now, that we have the requisite science fiction out of the way, could
I trouble you to answer my original question.
Is your theory that if you repeat the same garbage over and over,
eventually someone will believe it?


It is theory of Faraday, Lorenz, Marconi, Tesla and Dirac.

Who is the authors of yours?
S*


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question - Google Says : There are no more messages on this topic. All messages in this topic may have expired or been deleted. Nobody[_3_] Shortwave 0 September 23rd 07 02:23 AM
Question - Google Says : There are no more messages on this topic. All messages in this topic may have expired or been deleted. Roadie Shortwave 1 September 22nd 07 08:12 PM
Question - Google Says : There are no more messages on this topic. All messages in this topic may have expired or been deleted. Tom Shortwave 0 September 22nd 07 04:24 PM
For all those who Lament the Number of Off-Topic Posts - Post Something On Topic . . . Yes It Is That Simple ! RHF Shortwave 0 May 26th 06 11:04 AM
"Smorts the Warts" keeps posting off-topic; the boy just ain't right bright [was: More of "Smorts the Warts" off-topic wacked-off idiocy] Gray Shockley Shortwave 1 November 1st 03 10:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017