Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote:
I think we need to avoid Szczepan's black and white (and usually completely wrong) way of thinking about things. We need to consider "When does a monopole become a dipole" (or vice versa). With no actually ground connection, you could have a nominal monopole with (say) only one radial (eg an extremely badly radiating quarterwave radial running horizontally at ground level, and a quarterwave radiating element going vertically (or semi-vertically) upwards. If you then raise the radial so that it starts to radiate better - or if you raise the whole antenna system away from the ground - it will then increasingly become a dipole. It is always a dipole no matter where it is. The type of antenna is determined by it's geometry, not it's location or it's transmission line. It is the radiation pattern of the antenna that is effected by it's location. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using speaker wire for a dipole | Antenna | |||
80m Dipole fed with open wire feeder. | Antenna | |||
Newbie with a wire dipole | CB | |||
Receiver dipole vs 23 ft wire for HF | Antenna | |||
Long wire vs. G5RV/dipole | Shortwave |