Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote: "Would you publish an example?" I am error prone as anyone reading many of my postings may attest. The 1955 edition of Terman`s "Electronic and Radio Engineering" is the culmination of about 25 or more years of Terman`s work which was checked, rechecked, then checked again. It`s stood the test of time ever since its publication too. In Sect. 4-11 are answers to questions of impedance matching to transmission lines. I'll look up the book next time I am at Texas A&M. I think Terman should be consulted straight away for a simple logical cause of no reflections. It is called impedance matching. The match does away with reflections. Not directed at Richard, but I've seen the following logic used often with EM waves. What causes the match? The cancellation of reflections. What causes the cancellation of reflections? The match. Does anyone else detect the circular logic problem in the above? Another one: 'rho' is zero because there are no reflections. There are no reflections because 'rho' is zero. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder? | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math | Antenna |