Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "tom" wrote in message . .. On 2/24/2013 9:13 PM, tom wrote: I've done some searching for corrections for through the boom uninsulated and found that the opinion is that it's not a good idea. And it makes sense if you read why - the current is really high at the center of the element and any variation in contact resistance to the boom or material will change the result. What you would like is the result to be based on only the insulated element conductance and the shielding of the boom, which is easier to calculate and less variable. tom K0TAR Here's a reference that mentions reasons for not using uninsulated through the boom connectio9ns. And has some nice graphs on insulated through the boom. http://g7rau.demon.co.uk/sm5bsz/antennas/sa/others.htm tom K0TAR OK, I'm convinced. What I need is some lightweight non-metallic material for the boom and I can build with the numbers I have for element lengths. I'll hit the stores in the morning. I'll try a T-match, too. "Sal" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My latest homebrew project.... | Homebrew | |||
Wanted: Homebrew or Vintage HF Linear Project | Swap | |||
Homebrew RX restoration project | Boatanchors | |||
6 Meter Homebrew Project | Homebrew | |||
Help an old Ten-Tec tranceiver argonaut II in a homebrew transverter project | Homebrew |