Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 11th 14, 02:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default OK, let's discuss dipoles vs length

On 10/10/2014 6:49 PM, wrote:
David Platt wrote:
* It is a wire dipole (keep the wire AWG to practical values, please).
* The dipole's length is variable.


I forgot to add to the second * item, that we could use .5 wavelengths,
.25 wavelengths, .1 wavelengths and .05 wavelengths for comparison purposes.


In many of the antenna discussions I've read, the term "dipole" is
often reserved for antennas which are of approximately half-wavelength
resonance at the frequency in question.


That is the amateur radio convention, but not so for a physicist.

When a physicist is talking about 1/2 wave dipoles it is either stated
explicitly or obvious from the context.

"Doublet" is used for a center-fed dipole-like antenna of other
lengths... for example, a 40-meter dipole which is actually being used
on 15 meters would be referred to as a doublet. In this sort of
terminology, one could consider a "dipole" to be a particular special
case of a "doublet".


Again, this is amateur radio convention. I don't think I have ever seen
the term doublet in a "science" publication.


Isn't this a amateur radio group? I did a google search and while
dipole comes up a lot more often that simply indicates they are more
often used.

When I did a search for definitions of doublet I found only a few that
refer to a short dipole as a doublet, mostly it is a synonym for dipole.


Of course, there's the other school of thought which calls *all* of
these antennas "dipoles" (e.g. a "short dipole" or a "5/4-wave
center-fed dipole".


Yep, like you find in physics books, which BTW will always be center
fed unless otherwise specified.

All this language stuff becomes important if you concider the reading
audience can consist of anyone from someone with a passing interest
and little education to a Sheldon Cooper theoretical physicist.


One term I have seen used often is Hertzian dipole for an electrically
short dipole.

--

Rick
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Real Oil Drillers Discuss MC 252 dave Shortwave 2 May 15th 10 10:24 PM
Discuss about books chandru Shortwave 0 July 12th 08 11:34 AM
OT , You may need to discuss this . [email protected] CB 2 November 30th 07 12:51 AM
Anyone care to discuss... Professor CB 11 April 23rd 05 07:35 PM
Art Bell to discuss BPL on C-to-C AM TONIGHT (??) 3/20/04 Jim Hampton Policy 0 March 20th 04 10:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017