"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...


If you follow his 'theory' through, try applying it to light (which
follows the same laws of physics).

Basically, he is confused.

Once again, Brian,the origination of abuse comes from you.

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:18:22 AM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message

...





If you follow his 'theory' through, try applying it to light (which

follows the same laws of physics).



Basically, he is confused.



Once again, Brian,the origination of abuse comes from you.

Who cares.. This is not some silly abuse encounter group.. :/
Did you do what was suggested and run it through a program?
That will totally answer your question and you can see it visually.
You can download this program, and there are already beverage ant
files ready to go. Even a caveman could do it. It's free, and
good nuff for gov work. And it will handle a lot of segments for
the more complex antennas. The beverages are under the "receive"
antenna folder..

http://hamsoft.ca/pages/mmana-gal.php

wrote in message
...

This is not some silly abuse encounter group..

No? ...

Did you do what was suggested and run it through a program?
Even a caveman could do it.

.... and now, yes?

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:36:06 AM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
wrote in message

...



This is not some silly abuse encounter group..



No? ...



Did you do what was suggested and run it through a program?

Even a caveman could do it.



... and now, yes?

Well, I guess you know the answer to your question now.
Yes?

On 15/10/14 10:33, wrote:
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 4:18:22 AM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message

...





If you follow his 'theory' through, try applying it to light (which

follows the same laws of physics).



Basically, he is confused.



Once again, Brian,the origination of abuse comes from you.

Who cares.. This is not some silly abuse encounter group.. :/

You need to appreciate that Gareth considers anyone who corrects him as
being abusive.


Having seen him in action many, many times, I can assure you this is so
and point you are countless examples in the uk.r.a and other newsgroup
archives. He invariably uses a similar technique and ends up using the
same abusive terms (eg 'Silly Boy').

He has been doing this for well over a decade, he was using the same
techniques before I started using uk.r.a in around 2000.


It is really best not to respond to him directly, you will notice I
never do. If you ignore him, he eventually 'blows his top' and goes off
to sulk.

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:20:12 PM UTC-5, Brian Reay wrote:

It is really best not to respond to him directly, you will notice I

never do. If you ignore him, he eventually 'blows his top' and goes off

to sulk.

No worries. I enjoy toying with these types.
It's good wholesome fun for the whole family.
I'm pretty much convinced he's one of Art Unwin's long lost UK
relatives. :|
Their tactics and brand of bafflegab are quite similar.

On 10/15/2014 2:03 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:20:12 PM UTC-5, Brian Reay wrote:

It is really best not to respond to him directly, you will notice I

never do. If you ignore him, he eventually 'blows his top' and goes off

to sulk.

No worries. I enjoy toying with these types.
It's good wholesome fun for the whole family.
I'm pretty much convinced he's one of Art Unwin's long lost UK
relatives. :|
Their tactics and brand of bafflegab are quite similar.

And Gareth enjoys you toying with him... I hope that didn't sound too
much like a sexual metaphor.

--

Rick

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:14:20 PM UTC-5, rickman wrote:
On 10/15/2014 2:03 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:20:12 PM UTC-5, Brian Reay wrote:



It is really best not to respond to him directly, you will notice I



never do. If you ignore him, he eventually 'blows his top' and goes off



to sulk.



No worries. I enjoy toying with these types.

It's good wholesome fun for the whole family.

I'm pretty much convinced he's one of Art Unwin's long lost UK

relatives. :|

Their tactics and brand of bafflegab are quite similar.



And Gareth enjoys you toying with him... I hope that didn't sound too

much like a sexual metaphor.

It had been my intention to totally ignore you.. Remember?
You know the other day when your silly ass was trying to hump
my legs?

But here you are again.. Trying to fondle my trouser trout without
using your fingers... :+

I'm not aroused.

On 10/15/2014 8:28 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:14:20 PM UTC-5, rickman wrote:
On 10/15/2014 2:03 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:20:12 PM UTC-5, Brian Reay wrote:



It is really best not to respond to him directly, you will notice I



never do. If you ignore him, he eventually 'blows his top' and goes off



to sulk.



No worries. I enjoy toying with these types.

It's good wholesome fun for the whole family.

I'm pretty much convinced he's one of Art Unwin's long lost UK

relatives. :|

Their tactics and brand of bafflegab are quite similar.



And Gareth enjoys you toying with him... I hope that didn't sound too

much like a sexual metaphor.

It had been my intention to totally ignore you.. Remember?
You know the other day when your silly ass was trying to hump
my legs?

But here you are again.. Trying to fondle my trouser trout without
using your fingers... :+

I'm not aroused.

I can tell.... I just don't understand why you leave it hanging out all
the time.


--

Rick

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
You need to appreciate that Gareth considers anyone who corrects him as
being abusive.

Untrue, but you take every opportunity to be abusive to me, as above.


Having seen him in action many, many times, I can assure you this is so
and point you are countless examples in the uk.r.a and other newsgroup
archives.

Untrue.

He invariably uses a similar technique and ends up using the same abusive
terms (eg 'Silly Boy').

Untrue.

He has been doing this for well over a decade, he was using the same
techniques before I started using uk.r.a in around 2000.

Untrue.


It is really best not to respond to him directly, you will notice I never
do. If you ignore him, he eventually 'blows his top' and goes off to sulk.

Untrue.