Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 9:20 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote: On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 9:34 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/26/2014 9:20 PM, Brian Reay wrote: On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote: On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. So why do the rest of you have to act like children as well? Why not just ignore him? I seem to recall that you have stated that you take pleasure in jousting with him. Or do I have you mixed up with someone else? The bottom line is that by arguing with him endlessly it ruins the group for everyone else every bit as much as he does, if not more. If it were just him he would be easy to ignore. The topics he brings up could be discussed without all the back and forth banter. Just treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name! -- Rick |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote:
Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? UKRA used to be a lively and interesting AR group, before those that claimed it was a 'cesspit' started to believe their own rhetoric and then tried to turn it into one. The rec.radio.amateur.* series is basically a wasteland of cross-posted blogs and newsletters; if they were merged into one single group at least it would spare the bandwidth wasted in the cross-posting. Time for a US-based RFD, perhaps. I understand that the person who had a hand in cleaning them up from whatever they were suffering from before now indirectly has a hand in trying to clean up ukra by proposing a parallel moderated group, and perhaps the above is the reason so little UK-based support has emerged for the proposal. -- Spike "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding" Louis D. Brandeis |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote:
Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? Not really. Previously the group was used as a soapbox where big-ego big-mouths expounded their latest OT conspiracy theories, but the egotistical Napoleon types are now using most of their energies to oppose the creation of the moderated group - I wonder why? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
In message
, Brian Reay writes Jerry Stuckle wrote: There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. His understanding is certainly limited, there is other evidence to support that, but as for attempts at improving understanding, why does recycle the same topics again and again? Some have been around the block several times, even though they have been explained. He makes no attempt to digest the responses he receives, beyond twisting highlights to further his barrage of abuse. Why is this obvious? Well, he rubbishes perfectly valid answers and even, on occasions, goes on to rewrite history as if he has 'found a book' which explains things. The question is, why? Do a search for Westinghouse in the archive of uk.railway I really think that Rick's advice is best, although I wouldn't go as far as to "treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name". He has, on the odd occasion, some very valid points to make. However, you have to be careful, as this is sometimes just a ploy (conscious or otherwise) to draw you into what you think is a normal, civilised discussion, and it rapidly turns out not to be. The important thing is not prolong pointless arguments, otherwise you risk getting tarred with the same brush. -- Ian |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Once again, the origination of abuse comes from you. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... His understanding is certainly limited, there is other evidence to support that, but as for attempts at improving understanding, why does recycle the same topics again and again? Some have been around the block several times, even though they have been explained. He makes no attempt to digest the responses he receives, beyond twisting highlights to further his barrage of abuse. Why is this obvious? Well, he rubbishes perfectly valid answers and even, on occasions, goes on to rewrite history as if he has 'found a book' which explains things. The question is, why? Do a search for Westinghouse in the archive of uk.railway Once again, the abuse originates with you such that you seem to have a particularly unhealthy obsession with me to the extent that all your contributions to technical NG are abusive. Physician, heal thyself. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
... He has, on the odd occasion, some very valid points to make. I always have valid points to make. However, you have to be careful, as this is sometimes just a ploy (conscious or otherwise) to draw you into what you think is a normal, civilised discussion, and it rapidly turns out not to be. Completely untrue. It is a device of the gratuitously abusive to justify their own abusive psyches by claiming that my intention is to cause abuse, which it has never been in 20 years of subscribing to Usenet. By expressing such an opinion, you are allowing yourself to be brainwashed by reay. The important thing is not prolong pointless arguments, otherwise you risk getting tarred with the same brush. Agree absolutely, but technical discussions are not pointless arguments. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:02:29 -0400, rickman wrote:
Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? It does happen :-) But along come the insult throwers and all hell breaks out. It's like the school playground when teacher goes behind the bike shed for smoke. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:34:08 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. Watching from the sidelines I see the insults flying in all directions. If someone has made an error there are good ways and bad ways of pointing that out as any parent will know. What we normally see here is the bad way which usually involves attacking the person rather than the idea. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|