Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 10th 14, 10:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,382
Default The proof of the pudding?

"Wimpie" wrote in message
...
The reason that you don't need to take magnetic dipole radiation into
account in real mechanical systems is because of the radiated power is
very low (low RPM in practical mechanical systems). Friction
(bearings/air, eddy current, etc) is orders of magnitude more then the
"friction" caused by the EM radiation.


Further proof, if any were needed, that a short antenna is a poor radiator.

(Frequencies of mechanical rotation representing wavelengthe of several
miles, against which the length of the magnet is trivial, and why, in the
case
of the superconductor example, there is no measurable decrease in
rotational speed, in the short term, at least.)


(Typos in title line corrected)


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 10th 14, 11:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default The proof of the pudding?

gareth wrote:
"Wimpie" wrote in message
...
The reason that you don't need to take magnetic dipole radiation into
account in real mechanical systems is because of the radiated power is
very low (low RPM in practical mechanical systems). Friction
(bearings/air, eddy current, etc) is orders of magnitude more then the
"friction" caused by the EM radiation.


Further proof, if any were needed, that a short antenna is a poor radiator.

(Frequencies of mechanical rotation representing wavelengthe of several
miles, against which the length of the magnet is trivial, and why, in the
case
of the superconductor example, there is no measurable decrease in
rotational speed, in the short term, at least.)


(Typos in title line corrected)


Further proof, if any is needed, that you are an arm waver incapable
of producing any numbers.



--
Jim Pennino
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 11th 14, 12:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,382
Default The proof of the pudding?

wrote in message
...
gareth wrote:
"Wimpie" wrote in message
...
The reason that you don't need to take magnetic dipole radiation into
account in real mechanical systems is because of the radiated power is
very low (low RPM in practical mechanical systems). Friction
(bearings/air, eddy current, etc) is orders of magnitude more then the
"friction" caused by the EM radiation.

Further proof, if any were needed, that a short antenna is a poor
radiator.
(Frequencies of mechanical rotation representing wavelengthe of several
miles, against which the length of the magnet is trivial, and why, in the
case
of the superconductor example, there is no measurable decrease in
rotational speed, in the short term, at least.)
(Typos in title line corrected)

Further proof, if any is needed, that you are an arm waver incapable
of producing any numbers.


And your numbers in your various (infantile) rebuttals?

Where are they?




  #7   Report Post  
Old November 11th 14, 01:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,382
Default The proof of the pudding?

"rickman" wrote in message
...
So you acknowledge that you have a compulsion to post regarding Gareth?


One thing that is different between you and jimp is that he knows damn
nothing
but you know damn all.


  #8   Report Post  
Old November 11th 14, 01:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default The proof of the pudding?

gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...
So you acknowledge that you have a compulsion to post regarding Gareth?


One thing that is different between you and jimp is that he knows damn
nothing
but you know damn all.


So how short is a "short antenna"?

What is the metric for "poor performance'?



--
Jim Pennino
  #9   Report Post  
Old November 11th 14, 01:54 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default The proof of the pudding?

gareth wrote:
wrote in message
...
gareth wrote:
"Wimpie" wrote in message
...
The reason that you don't need to take magnetic dipole radiation into
account in real mechanical systems is because of the radiated power is
very low (low RPM in practical mechanical systems). Friction
(bearings/air, eddy current, etc) is orders of magnitude more then the
"friction" caused by the EM radiation.
Further proof, if any were needed, that a short antenna is a poor
radiator.
(Frequencies of mechanical rotation representing wavelengthe of several
miles, against which the length of the magnet is trivial, and why, in the
case
of the superconductor example, there is no measurable decrease in
rotational speed, in the short term, at least.)
(Typos in title line corrected)

Further proof, if any is needed, that you are an arm waver incapable
of producing any numbers.


And your numbers in your various (infantile) rebuttals?

Where are they?


I have made several posts containing lots of numbers which you have yet to
make any comment on.

How short is a "short antenna"?

Wht is the metric for "poor performance"?



--
Jim Pennino
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You don't need any more proof. Slow Code General 1 November 30th 06 03:21 AM
MORKIE, PORKIE, PUDDING AND PIE, ADMITS HE'S "MARRIED" TO A GUY ! ! ! K4YZ Policy 6 July 19th 06 02:42 PM
Proof of Stevie Double Standard, if proof were really needed an_old_friend Policy 1 August 19th 05 08:22 PM
MORE PROOF codemonkey Swap 1 January 5th 05 09:14 PM
N3CVJ asks for PROOF! Proof it is.. Twistedhed CB 9 August 29th 03 02:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017