Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 11:10 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 9:12 PM, wrote:

snip

Which question was that, why QSL cards or awards are irrelevant as a
measure of antenna performance like you keep trying to claim?

It is proof that my antenna worked

A light bulb will "work" as an antenna.


OK, let's see you get WAS on 80 meters with a light bulb.

Anything that conducts, from a light bulb to a set of bed springs can
act as an antenna and some contacts can be made; I've done it with
both.

Simply because something "works" says nothing about how well it works.

You are simply unable to accept the fact that something you had could
have worked better, thus you rant and fume and go off on tangents.


--
Jim Pennino

On 11/23/2014 1:02 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 11:10 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 9:12 PM, wrote:

snip

Which question was that, why QSL cards or awards are irrelevant as a
measure of antenna performance like you keep trying to claim?

It is proof that my antenna worked

A light bulb will "work" as an antenna.


OK, let's see you get WAS on 80 meters with a light bulb.

Anything that conducts, from a light bulb to a set of bed springs can
act as an antenna and some contacts can be made; I've done it with
both.

Simply because something "works" says nothing about how well it works.

You are simply unable to accept the fact that something you had could
have worked better, thus you rant and fume and go off on tangents.



Where did I say something could not have worked better? Or are you
trying to put words in my mouth, again? That's what trolls do, after all.

All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.

You went into a multipost rage when it was implied that something you
did was less than perfect and you are still raging about it.


--
Jim Pennino

On 11/23/2014 4:07 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.

You went into a multipost rage when it was implied that something you
did was less than perfect and you are still raging about it.



Your proof, troll?

Oh, on the rage issue - you're projecting (again).

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/23/2014 4:07 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.

You went into a multipost rage when it was implied that something you
did was less than perfect and you are still raging about it.



Your proof, troll?

Your post after post after post.

The bottom line is that it was implied that something you did, used, made,
worked with, said, or observed was less than perfect, at which point you
went off into one of your usual rages.

Once the rage starts, the other person is a troll, an anonymous troll, a
liar, ignorant, stupid and a few other of your usual ad hominem responses.

Once the rage really gets going, you start interpreting what the other
person says as having the opposite meaning to what was said and saying
the other person said things that were never said.

During the rage you go off onto tangets based on your misinterpretation of
the other persons responses that can only be seen though your blood lust
filled eyes.

The rage will often continue across topics and sometimes even groups
as blood lust within you boils over.

This will continue until everyone else gives up and you have the last
word.

You are just an egomaniacal playground bully.


--
Jim Pennino

On 11/23/2014 5:04 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/23/2014 4:07 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

ssnip

All I said was your comment about an 80 meter dipole under 100' off the
ground sucks is wrong. And I supplied the proof for it.

You went into a multipost rage when it was implied that something you
did was less than perfect and you are still raging about it.



Your proof, troll?

Your post after post after post.

The bottom line is that it was implied that something you did, used, made,
worked with, said, or observed was less than perfect, at which point you
went off into one of your usual rages.

Once the rage starts, the other person is a troll, an anonymous troll, a
liar, ignorant, stupid and a few other of your usual ad hominem responses.

Once the rage really gets going, you start interpreting what the other
person says as having the opposite meaning to what was said and saying
the other person said things that were never said.

During the rage you go off onto tangets based on your misinterpretation of
the other persons responses that can only be seen though your blood lust
filled eyes.

The rage will often continue across topics and sometimes even groups
as blood lust within you boils over.

This will continue until everyone else gives up and you have the last
word.

You are just an egomaniacal playground bully.



Your proof, troll?

You're the one who has tried to take this off on tangents. But you
can't stand that I won't fall for your troll techniques.

Once a troll, always a troll. You're the perfect example.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

snip

Once a troll, always a troll. You're the perfect example.


The bottom line is that it was implied that something you did, used, made,
worked with, said, or observed was less than perfect, at which point you
went off into one of your usual rages.

Once the rage starts, the other person is a troll, an anonymous troll, a
liar, ignorant, stupid and a few other of your usual ad hominem responses.

Once the rage really gets going, you start interpreting what the other
person says as having the opposite meaning to what was said and saying
the other person said things that were never said.

During the rage you go off onto tangets based on your misinterpretation of
the other persons responses that can only be seen though your blood lust
filled eyes.

The rage will often continue across topics and sometimes even groups
as blood lust within you boils over.

This will continue until everyone else gives up and you have the last
word.

You are just a thin skinned, egomaniacal playground bully with delusions
of perfection.

--
Jim Pennino