Battery question???
 

On 6/18/2015 6:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:56 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:10 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 3:16 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 8:19 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"rickman" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 2:10 AM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...



Which proves it needs replacement. It's calibration is off. False
alarms are almost as bad as missing real alarms.

Don't worry about Jerry. He is always like that. Once he takes a
position he will defend it to the bitter end no matter how much you
prove him wrong.

==============================================

Oh, I've spent enough time here that I know about Jerry. He's free to
speak
his mind and I'll be fine.

"Sal" (just an online nickname)

Yes, it seems many of the nym'd trolls hate me.

And it doesn't bother me a bit. I understand why you use 'nyms - I
wouldn't want anyone to know how stoopid I was if I were you, either.

================================================== =====================

Hi, Jerry. Nice to hear from you again. I can't tell if your problem
is reading comprehension or memory. It could be a little of each.

See, whenever I'm active here, I put my callsign after my "nym," as you
call it, about once a week. Earlier this year, you observed the
discrepancy between my callsign and the name "Sal" so you went on a
rant. You forgot about that, didn't you? Yeah.

I doubt anybody hates you. For me, it's more a matter of not liking
much that you post because it's so often argumentative and
mean-spirited. (In debate, your cutting personal remarks are called
ad-hominem attack.)

Jerry, I want you to live a long, happy life. Too bad you're not
off to
a very good start.

I think that sums it up pretty well. I don't have any reason to "hate"
Jerry. I just feel his posts are, as you say, mean spirited. Heck he
goes out of his way to find dirt on me which is so stupid I don't have
words for it. This is the Internet. None of this matters one whit.

BTW Jerry, have you found my degrees yet?


No, Rick. UMD has no record of them. I wonder why?

And no, I don't "go out of my way to find dirt on you". All I do is
call you on your stoopidity - which you show so readily.

Jerry, you make me laugh. I guess I should be grateful for that.

BTW, I figured you were full of it. I went to the UMD web site and I
don't see any way you can access that info without having enough details
on me to verify who exactly I am... which I'm sure you don't have. So
of course you can't find proof that I graduated UMD.

You might try this page...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Park_peopl e



I don't need to go to the UMD website. The campus is about 10 miles
from me. I can easily go to the registrar's office to see exactly who
graduated in any year. And do you know how many people graduated with
an MSEE in 1982? I'll give you a hint - you were NOT one of them. Even
the yearbook (available in the campus library) shows graduates for each
year.

Additionally, as a local business owner, it's very easy for me to get
the public records of graduates - not that I needed to use that option.

However - I know you aren't a ham, or you wouldn't picked a campus as
close to me as you did, hoping I wouldn't be able to check it out. And
I know you don't have an MSEE from the pure bull**** you've posted in
this newsgroup.

You've been caught, rickman. And your lies won't get you out of it.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Battery question???
 

On 6/18/2015 7:39 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 6:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:56 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:10 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 3:16 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 8:19 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"rickman" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 2:10 AM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...



Which proves it needs replacement. It's calibration is off. False
alarms are almost as bad as missing real alarms.

Don't worry about Jerry. He is always like that. Once he takes a
position he will defend it to the bitter end no matter how much you
prove him wrong.

==============================================

Oh, I've spent enough time here that I know about Jerry. He's free to
speak
his mind and I'll be fine.

"Sal" (just an online nickname)

Yes, it seems many of the nym'd trolls hate me.

And it doesn't bother me a bit. I understand why you use 'nyms - I
wouldn't want anyone to know how stoopid I was if I were you, either.

================================================== =====================

Hi, Jerry. Nice to hear from you again. I can't tell if your problem
is reading comprehension or memory. It could be a little of each.

See, whenever I'm active here, I put my callsign after my "nym," as you
call it, about once a week. Earlier this year, you observed the
discrepancy between my callsign and the name "Sal" so you went on a
rant. You forgot about that, didn't you? Yeah.

I doubt anybody hates you. For me, it's more a matter of not liking
much that you post because it's so often argumentative and
mean-spirited. (In debate, your cutting personal remarks are called
ad-hominem attack.)

Jerry, I want you to live a long, happy life. Too bad you're not
off to
a very good start.

I think that sums it up pretty well. I don't have any reason to "hate"
Jerry. I just feel his posts are, as you say, mean spirited. Heck he
goes out of his way to find dirt on me which is so stupid I don't have
words for it. This is the Internet. None of this matters one whit.

BTW Jerry, have you found my degrees yet?


No, Rick. UMD has no record of them. I wonder why?

And no, I don't "go out of my way to find dirt on you". All I do is
call you on your stoopidity - which you show so readily.

Jerry, you make me laugh. I guess I should be grateful for that.

BTW, I figured you were full of it. I went to the UMD web site and I
don't see any way you can access that info without having enough details
on me to verify who exactly I am... which I'm sure you don't have. So
of course you can't find proof that I graduated UMD.

You might try this page...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Park_peopl e



I don't need to go to the UMD website. The campus is about 10 miles
from me. I can easily go to the registrar's office to see exactly who
graduated in any year. And do you know how many people graduated with
an MSEE in 1982? I'll give you a hint - you were NOT one of them. Even
the yearbook (available in the campus library) shows graduates for each
year.

Additionally, as a local business owner, it's very easy for me to get
the public records of graduates - not that I needed to use that option.

However - I know you aren't a ham, or you wouldn't picked a campus as
close to me as you did, hoping I wouldn't be able to check it out. And
I know you don't have an MSEE from the pure bull**** you've posted in
this newsgroup.

You've been caught, rickman. And your lies won't get you out of it.

You are good Jerry, but not nearly as good as you think. lol

Come to my house and check out my diploma. It's a big honkin' mother.
In that era dry mounting on a board was popular but I didn't realize it
would be so large. I actually had to drag it into work once so they
could photo copy it. Actually, *them*. I got two from UMD you know. :)

--

Rick

Battery question???
 

"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...

much snippage

Remove the "x" from my email address

================================================== ============

Instead, I think I'll remove everything. I did it once but then reloaded my
newsreader, which brought you back.

72 (not quite 73) from your newsgroup pal,
"Sal"

Battery question???
 

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

I don't need to go to the UMD website. The campus is about 10 miles
from me. I can easily go to the registrar's office to see exactly who
graduated in any year. And do you know how many people graduated with
an MSEE in 1982? I'll give you a hint - you were NOT one of them. Even
the yearbook (available in the campus library) shows graduates for each
year.

Sounds like an obsessed stalker to me.

Additionally, as a local business owner, it's very easy for me to get
the public records of graduates - not that I needed to use that option.

Strange; on various occasions he's claimed to work for a CCTV installer,
audio systems installer, lighting installer, smoke detector installer,
and a few others, now he is a local business owner.

However - I know you aren't a ham, or you wouldn't picked a campus as
close to me as you did, hoping I wouldn't be able to check it out. And
I know you don't have an MSEE from the pure bull**** you've posted in
this newsgroup.

Someone that feels a need go check out USENET posters has some very
big mental problems.

You've been caught, rickman. And your lies won't get you out of it.

I'd suggest rickman get a restaining order.


--
Jim Pennino

Battery question???
 

On 6/18/2015 8:11 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...

much snippage

Remove the "x" from my email address

================================================== ============

Instead, I think I'll remove everything. I did it once but then
reloaded my newsreader, which brought you back.

72 (not quite 73) from your newsgroup pal,
"Sal"

Doesn't bother me a bit.

But I know that I don't care what you think ****es the hell out of you!
ROFLMAO!

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Battery question???
 

On 6/18/2015 8:07 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 7:39 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 6:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:56 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:10 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 3:16 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 8:19 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"rickman" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 2:10 AM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...



Which proves it needs replacement. It's calibration is off. False
alarms are almost as bad as missing real alarms.

Don't worry about Jerry. He is always like that. Once he takes a
position he will defend it to the bitter end no matter how much you
prove him wrong.

==============================================

Oh, I've spent enough time here that I know about Jerry. He's
free to
speak
his mind and I'll be fine.

"Sal" (just an online nickname)

Yes, it seems many of the nym'd trolls hate me.

And it doesn't bother me a bit. I understand why you use 'nyms - I
wouldn't want anyone to know how stoopid I was if I were you, either.

================================================== =====================


Hi, Jerry. Nice to hear from you again. I can't tell if your
problem
is reading comprehension or memory. It could be a little of each.

See, whenever I'm active here, I put my callsign after my "nym,"
as you
call it, about once a week. Earlier this year, you observed the
discrepancy between my callsign and the name "Sal" so you went on a
rant. You forgot about that, didn't you? Yeah.

I doubt anybody hates you. For me, it's more a matter of not liking
much that you post because it's so often argumentative and
mean-spirited. (In debate, your cutting personal remarks are called
ad-hominem attack.)

Jerry, I want you to live a long, happy life. Too bad you're not
off to
a very good start.

I think that sums it up pretty well. I don't have any reason to
"hate"
Jerry. I just feel his posts are, as you say, mean spirited. Heck he
goes out of his way to find dirt on me which is so stupid I don't have
words for it. This is the Internet. None of this matters one whit.

BTW Jerry, have you found my degrees yet?


No, Rick. UMD has no record of them. I wonder why?

And no, I don't "go out of my way to find dirt on you". All I do is
call you on your stoopidity - which you show so readily.

Jerry, you make me laugh. I guess I should be grateful for that.

BTW, I figured you were full of it. I went to the UMD web site and I
don't see any way you can access that info without having enough details
on me to verify who exactly I am... which I'm sure you don't have. So
of course you can't find proof that I graduated UMD.

You might try this page...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Park_peopl e




I don't need to go to the UMD website. The campus is about 10 miles
from me. I can easily go to the registrar's office to see exactly who
graduated in any year. And do you know how many people graduated with
an MSEE in 1982? I'll give you a hint - you were NOT one of them. Even
the yearbook (available in the campus library) shows graduates for each
year.

Additionally, as a local business owner, it's very easy for me to get
the public records of graduates - not that I needed to use that option.

However - I know you aren't a ham, or you wouldn't picked a campus as
close to me as you did, hoping I wouldn't be able to check it out. And
I know you don't have an MSEE from the pure bull**** you've posted in
this newsgroup.

You've been caught, rickman. And your lies won't get you out of it.

You are good Jerry, but not nearly as good as you think. lol

Come to my house and check out my diploma. It's a big honkin' mother.
In that era dry mounting on a board was popular but I didn't realize it
would be so large. I actually had to drag it into work once so they
could photo copy it. Actually, *them*. I got two from UMD you know. :)


ROFLMAO. You didn't get anything from UMD. And their records prove it.

But then your lack of knowledge of anything even a EE sophomore would
understand gave you away long ago. If you can't find it in Wikipedia,
it doesn't exist.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Battery question???
 

On 6/18/2015 9:14 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

Someone that feels a need go check out USENET posters has some very
big mental problems.

You've been caught, rickman. And your lies won't get you out of it.

I'd suggest rickman get a restaining order.

It was interesting to look at the UMD records and see what I could find.
I never thought about it before. The strange part is that when I did
find some publicly available records my name is there, as clear as
spring water. I have no idea what he is going on about saying he
"caught" me. Whatever. To paraphrase Chinatown, "Forget it Jake, it's
the Internet".

--

Rick

Battery question???
 

On 19/06/15 00:39, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 6:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:56 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:10 PM, rickman wrote:
On 6/18/2015 3:16 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 8:19 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"rickman" wrote in message ...

On 6/14/2015 2:10 AM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ...



Which proves it needs replacement. It's calibration is off. False
alarms are almost as bad as missing real alarms.

Don't worry about Jerry. He is always like that. Once he takes a
position he will defend it to the bitter end no matter how much you
prove him wrong.

==============================================

Oh, I've spent enough time here that I know about Jerry. He's free to
speak
his mind and I'll be fine.

"Sal" (just an online nickname)

Yes, it seems many of the nym'd trolls hate me.

And it doesn't bother me a bit. I understand why you use 'nyms - I
wouldn't want anyone to know how stoopid I was if I were you, either.

================================================== =====================

Hi, Jerry. Nice to hear from you again. I can't tell if your problem
is reading comprehension or memory. It could be a little of each.

See, whenever I'm active here, I put my callsign after my "nym," as you
call it, about once a week. Earlier this year, you observed the
discrepancy between my callsign and the name "Sal" so you went on a
rant. You forgot about that, didn't you? Yeah.

I doubt anybody hates you. For me, it's more a matter of not liking
much that you post because it's so often argumentative and
mean-spirited. (In debate, your cutting personal remarks are called
ad-hominem attack.)

Jerry, I want you to live a long, happy life. Too bad you're not
off to
a very good start.

I think that sums it up pretty well. I don't have any reason to "hate"
Jerry. I just feel his posts are, as you say, mean spirited. Heck he
goes out of his way to find dirt on me which is so stupid I don't have
words for it. This is the Internet. None of this matters one whit.

BTW Jerry, have you found my degrees yet?


No, Rick. UMD has no record of them. I wonder why?

And no, I don't "go out of my way to find dirt on you". All I do is
call you on your stoopidity - which you show so readily.

Jerry, you make me laugh. I guess I should be grateful for that.

BTW, I figured you were full of it. I went to the UMD web site and I
don't see any way you can access that info without having enough details
on me to verify who exactly I am... which I'm sure you don't have. So
of course you can't find proof that I graduated UMD.

You might try this page...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o..._Park_peopl e



I don't need to go to the UMD website. The campus is about 10 miles
from me. I can easily go to the registrar's office to see exactly who
graduated in any year. And do you know how many people graduated with
an MSEE in 1982? I'll give you a hint - you were NOT one of them. Even
the yearbook (available in the campus library) shows graduates for each
year.

Additionally, as a local business owner, it's very easy for me to get
the public records of graduates - not that I needed to use that option.

However - I know you aren't a ham, or you wouldn't picked a campus as
close to me as you did, hoping I wouldn't be able to check it out. And
I know you don't have an MSEE from the pure bull**** you've posted in
this newsgroup.

You've been caught, rickman. And your lies won't get you out of it.
======================================

Following this tread I have not found anything related to amateur radio
and/or antennas .......how come ?

Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH in IO87AT

Battery question???
 

In article , Jerry Stuckle writes:
This is one reason why ionization detectors are not recommended any more
- too many false alarms. That, plus photoelectric detectors are much
faster at detecting real fires.

And to avoid everyone just repeating whomever their favorite
pontificator is, let's inject something a bit more authoritative.

Courtesy Wikipedia:

According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA),
"photoelectric smoke detection is generally more responsive to fires
that begin with a long period of smoldering (called smoldering
fires)." Also, studies by Texas A&M and the NFPA cited by the City of
Palo Alto California state, "Photoelectric alarms react slower to
rapidly growing fires than ionization alarms, but laboratory and field
tests have shown that photoelectric smoke alarms provide adequate
warning for all types of fires and have been shown to be far less
likely to be deactivated by occupants."

Although photoelectric alarms are highly effective at detecting
smoldering fires and do provide adequate protection from flaming
fires, fire safety experts and the National Fire Protection Agency
recommend installing what are called combination alarms, which are
alarms that either detect both heat and smoke, or use both the
ionization and photoelectric processes. Also some combination alarms
may include a carbon monoxide detection capability.

[...]

A 2004 NIST report concluded that, "Smoke alarms of either the
ionization type or the photoelectric type consistently provided time
for occupants to escape from most residential fires," and, "Consistent
with prior findings, ionization type alarms provided somewhat better
response to flaming fires than photoelectric alarms (57 to 62 seconds
faster response), and photoelectric alarms provided (often)
considerably faster response to smoldering fires than ionization type
alarms (47 to 53 minutes faster response)."[13]

Regular cleaning can prevent false alarms caused by the buildup of
dust or other objects such as flies, particularly on optical type
alarms as they are more susceptible to these factors. A vacuum cleaner
can be used to clean ionization and optical detectors externally and
internally. However, on commercial ionization detectors it is not
recommended for a lay person to clean internally. To reduce false
alarms caused by cooking fumes, use an optical or 'toast proof' alarm
near the kitchen.[42]


Ionization has its uses, and photoelectric is better in at least one very
important way, but the US NFPA recommends a combination of both types.

And, after all, the best reason to avoid old detectors is to get updated
to the newest technologies.

Oh, and if you look at the more garish anecdotal reports you will find
the cases where ionization detectors outright missed smouldering fires
until it was too late. But the jury cases that followed appear to be
overreactions (somebody died because some technology was not perfect),
and when the Firefighter's Association begins pushing for tighter
standards than fire protection professionals (NFPA), it might be
understandable - one first hand anecdote can in a first responder's
mind trump a thousand studies.

Find out what is recommended, folks, and update to that.

[I should talk - that combined detector I bought years ago, one that is
also dual powered, is still sitting on the workbench].

George

Battery question???
 

On 9/6/2015 8:52 AM, George Cornelius wrote:
In article , Jerry Stuckle writes:
This is one reason why ionization detectors are not recommended any more
- too many false alarms. That, plus photoelectric detectors are much
faster at detecting real fires.

And to avoid everyone just repeating whomever their favorite
pontificator is, let's inject something a bit more authoritative.

Courtesy Wikipedia:


snip rest of crap

You really cite Wikipedia as a trusted source? ROFLMAO!

Try a real source - like reports from NFPA, independent laboratory
tests, etc. Then maybe you can have some respectability - which you do
not have now.


George


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================