LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #34   Report Post  
Old September 6th 15, 05:11 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 550
Default Battery question???

On 9/6/2015 8:19 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/6/2015 8:52 AM, George Cornelius wrote:
In article , Jerry Stuckle writes:
This is one reason why ionization detectors are not recommended any more
- too many false alarms. That, plus photoelectric detectors are much
faster at detecting real fires.


And to avoid everyone just repeating whomever their favorite
pontificator is, let's inject something a bit more authoritative.

Courtesy Wikipedia:


snip rest of crap

You really cite Wikipedia as a trusted source? ROFLMAO!

Try a real source - like reports from NFPA, independent laboratory
tests, etc. Then maybe you can have some respectability - which you do
not have now.


George


He did, via Wikipedia.

"According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)... "

You haven't learned to read yet?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Battery question Jack VK2CJC Moderated 10 December 27th 07 04:05 PM
HT Battery question Jeff Equipment 3 April 12th 05 02:19 AM
IC-730 and IC-735 battery question Robb Leamy Equipment 4 March 20th 05 02:20 PM
Battery question Greg Dermer Homebrew 1 September 21st 04 09:26 PM
battery question Anthony B. Scanner 1 July 9th 03 10:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017