Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do antennas radiate photons?
In article , Jeff Liebermann writes:
Thanks and interesting. I discarded synthetic aperture imaging because I assumed that either the sensor array or the object being imaged had to be moving roughly perpendicular to each other. That seems to be the case with SAR (synthetic aperture radar). I'll read some more (later) as I have no experience with the technology. You mean you were planning a 30,000 foot eyeball and no way to aim it? Yes, you are probably right - there would be issues with off-axis imaging, especially if the individual antennas were widely spaced. Unfortunately what I know beyond what I talked about is rather sketchy, but I do know that synthetic apertures are used for optical telescopes. Instead of a single, perfectly polished mirror, you place multiple mirrors somewhat distant from one another and use optical magic (smoke and mirrors?) to put it all together for form an image. Anyway, if you have a telescope mirror with holes in it, you have tradeoffs. I'm guessing that what happens is that there are aliasing effects. If the spacing along, say, the x axis, is s and wavelength is w, you will have alaising - images of off-axis points that appear to be on-axis, for example - and I would expect those to be at angles arcsin ( N w / s ) relative to the normal (read arcsin as "the angle whose sine is") If you want to see something that is off axis, you might be able to leverage this if each antenna is directional and blocks most energy from outside a main lobe narrow enough that, for small N at least, the antanna only picks up signals from one of the aliased angles and blocks the adjacent ones - kind of like an RF amp passband that allows a desired frequency through and not its image frequency. And you might be able to tune the pattern so the nulls in the pattern at least partially null out aliases at the N-1 and N+1 angles, where you would have to have some lobe width adjustment if you wanted to use this technique for more than just a single value of N. If you don't want to use a dish, perhaps you could use a 'Pringles can' antenna with a dipole at the far end of a long cylinder - your "telescope body". You would feed measured magnitude and phase from each antenna to your computer to have it produce an image. And if you were really good, and used a UHF illumination source, you would interfere the illumination source with the received signals and via holographic techniques produce true 3D. Just speculation. But if it's doable I would guess the military has already done it. George |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Do antennas radiate photons?
In article , I wrote:
If you want to see something that is off axis, you might be able to leverage this if each antenna is directional and blocks most energy from outside a main lobe narrow enough that, for small N at least, the antanna only picks up signals from one of the aliased angles and blocks the adjacent ones - kind of like an RF amp passband that allows a desired frequency through and not its image frequency. Actually, the angular spacing increases with N, so if the dish excludes alias images when aligned with the overall "optical axis" then it excludes them when aimed off axis as well. And I am assuming s w, or the formula gives no aliasing at all. George |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No antennae radiate all the power fed to them! | Antenna | |||
Photons | Antenna | |||
Photons | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna |