Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Remote tuner specs
Wayne wrote:
I was looking at a MFJ remote antenna tuner, and it is specified as being able to match 12 to 1600 ohms. What does that mean? At 12 ohms the SWR would be about 4.2:1 and at 1600 ohms a SWR of about 32:1. If one started from 1600 ohms around a Smith chart, the circle would intersect at the other side at about 0.64 ohms. Likewise starting at 12 ohms and going halfway around the chart would end up at 210 ohms, not 1600. How does one use the specs if the antenna to be matched has a complex impedance? Look at the internal tuner component ranges? Those ranges of impedances are basically worthless. Looking at the component ranges is probably the best, but most complex way. Some makers give half way usefull info with things like will tune a minumum of X feet long at 160 M. I have both a SGC and a LDG; the SGC is much better range wise. -- Jim Pennino |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Remote tuner specs
wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: Those ranges of impedances are basically worthless. I don't agree :-) If I had to test such a tuner the first thing I would do is put a pure resistor of those values and try to match them accross the frequency and power range announced. Measuring the insertion loss would be nice too. Of course it is not the complete story but a good start. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Remote tuner specs
"bilou" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: Those ranges of impedances are basically worthless. I don't agree :-) If I had to test such a tuner the first thing I would do is put a pure resistor of those values and try to match them accross the frequency and power range announced. Measuring the insertion loss would be nice too. Of course it is not the complete story but a good start. That's true, but I would like for the specs to give me an idea if I want to buy it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Remote tuner specs
bilou wrote:
wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: Those ranges of impedances are basically worthless. I don't agree :-) If I had to test such a tuner the first thing I would do is put a pure resistor of those values and try to match them accross the frequency and power range announced. Measuring the insertion loss would be nice too. Of course it is not the complete story but a good start. Which basically tells you nothing about the ability to match a complex load. I measured the impdance of a vertical to be well under the specified limits of the LDG tuner I own. However, it fails to get a match on 160 M and 17 M. The SGC tuner has no problems getting a match. -- Jim Pennino |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Remote tuner specs
wrote in message ... bilou wrote: wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: Those ranges of impedances are basically worthless. I don't agree :-) If I had to test such a tuner the first thing I would do is put a pure resistor of those values and try to match them accross the frequency and power range announced. Measuring the insertion loss would be nice too. Of course it is not the complete story but a good start. Which basically tells you nothing about the ability to match a complex load. Hello You are absolutely right in fact a perfect ferrite transformer would be better. But an aerial must have a real impedance part to be of any use :-) Specifications must be easy to verify. Here it is the case. How do you check the 0.1dB noise figure advocated by many LNB's ? :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Remote tuner specs
bilou wrote:
wrote in message ... bilou wrote: wrote in message ... Wayne wrote: Those ranges of impedances are basically worthless. I don't agree :-) If I had to test such a tuner the first thing I would do is put a pure resistor of those values and try to match them accross the frequency and power range announced. Measuring the insertion loss would be nice too. Of course it is not the complete story but a good start. Which basically tells you nothing about the ability to match a complex load. Hello You are absolutely right in fact a perfect ferrite transformer would be better. It is rather difficult for a ferrite transformer to convert a random complex impedance to approximately 50 Ohm resistive, which is what an autotuner does. But an aerial must have a real impedance part to be of any use :-) Which is why one uses an autotuner to convert the random complex impedance to approximately 50 Ohm resistive. Specifications must be easy to verify. And life must be fair... Here it is the case. How do you check the 0.1dB noise figure advocated by many LNB's ? With test equipment. -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Remote tuner | Antenna | |||
Motor for remote controlled tuner | Antenna | |||
Remote antenna/tuner recommendations | Antenna | |||
FA: LDG RT-11 Automatic Antenna Tuner w/remote | Swap | |||
What tuner specs do I look for? | Antenna |