LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 16th 15, 06:49 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2012
Posts: 989
Default Photons?

On 9/16/2015 12:38 PM, Dave Platt wrote:
In article ,
Spike wrote:

If that is so, then the possibility of a communication channel must
exist, the transmission mechanism of which is being used by the
particles .


It doesn't "must" exist.


The possibility of a comms system must exist using this effect. That the
engineers haven't found a way to exploit it is a different issue.


I think that if you study how entanglement and quantum particles
actually work, you'll understand that this is *not* the case.

A good question to ask here is: what is this change that takes place? It
is clearly measurable.


Here's a good video-and-animations explanation of the entanglement,
how we know it exists, and why it cannot be used to transmit
classical information faster than the speed of light.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuvK-od647c

To sum it up: it's clearly measurable, but in order to show that it's
happening at all, you need to *compare* two sets of measurements - one
taken at each end of the experiment.

You cannot "see" the effect by looking only at the measurements taken
at one end of the experiment. Due to the nature of quantum mechanics,
the measurements taken at one end look entirely random.

The measurements you take at the other end of the experiment look
equally random, at the time that you take them.

It's only when you compare the two sets of measurements, that you can
see that they're "random, but opposite". And, you can't compare them
without sending one set of measurements to the other end of the
experiment... and this can't be done faster than lightspeed.


Good explanation. The point taken away from this is that the principle
of "spooky action at a distance" doesn't violate any laws we currently
hold to be true, partly because of the simultaneity issue. The speed of
light also sets a limit to how well you can establish the precedence of
events. The concept of simultaneous becomes "fuzzy" as limited by the
distance separating the two events. In some situations it becomes
impossible to say which of the two observations were first and so
clearly information can not be conveyed since the direction would depend
on which event was first.

--

Rick
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do antennas radiate photons? Wayne Antenna 45 September 8th 15 09:02 AM
Photons Art Unwin Antenna 12 January 13th 09 12:21 PM
Photons Art Unwin Antenna 0 January 11th 09 05:07 PM
Minimum photons-per-second [amplitude] required for 150 KHz? Radium[_2_] Antenna 37 June 25th 07 03:10 AM
Minimum photons-per-second [amplitude] required for 150 KHz? Radium[_2_] Shortwave 36 June 25th 07 03:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017