Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons,
what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? 2. Are jimp and brian reay one and the same, because both monikers display the same incapability of engaging in well-socialised civil conversations, resorting to infantile abuse, and both refuse to be drawn whenever challenged on a technical matter? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/9/2015 10:41 AM, gareth wrote:
1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons, what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? 2. Are jimp and brian reay one and the same, because both monikers display the same incapability of engaging in well-socialised civil conversations, resorting to infantile abuse, and both refuse to be drawn whenever challenged on a technical matter? What is the frequency of a 2x4? What is the IQ of Gareth? Both make as much sense as your questions. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gareth" wrote in message
... 1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons, what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? 2. Are jimp and brian reay one and the same, because both monikers display the same incapability of engaging in well-socialised civil conversations, resorting to infantile abuse, and both refuse to be drawn whenever challenged on a technical matter? Thank God there's only one Beanie, even one is ten too many. -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.uk |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "gareth" wrote in message ... 1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons, what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? Consider this. Waves and photons exist in visible light at any frequency. If the frequency is lowered below the visible spectrum all the way down to say, 1 MHz, at what point do the photons disappear? Or do they just get weak? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/9/2015 10:41 AM, gareth wrote: 1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons, what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? 2. Are jimp and brian reay one and the same, because both monikers display the same incapability of engaging in well-socialised civil conversations, resorting to infantile abuse, and both refuse to be drawn whenever challenged on a technical matter? What is the frequency of a 2x4? Applied to Gareth's head? Not frequent enough. What is the IQ of Gareth? Both make as much sense as your questions. Gareth has serious mental issues, he hasn't made any discernible sense for a long time. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Reay wrote:
"Wayne" wrote: Consider this. Waves and photons exist in visible light at any frequency. If the frequency is lowered below the visible spectrum all the way down to say, 1 MHz, at what point do the photons disappear? Or do they just get weak? You are making the same error as the village idiot. I don't think he is! He is demonstrating by reductio ad absurdum that the photons *don't* disappear. But thanks for reinforcing what everyone but Gareth is saying. You didn't really need to insult Gareth in the course of demonstrating where he is going wrong though, did you? All EM radiation is the same in its nature. Terms like light and radio waves are simply labels we have applied to different parts of the EM spectrum. In part possibly because we didn't realise they were related, I can't recall the history. The village idiot's confusion is added to by him trying to mix simple Bohr models of the atom with more complex ones. Basically, he is out of his depth, as usual. He is forever trying to mix 'school book' physics with terms he has picked up but doesn't understand. When people try to help him, he abuses them, sometimes inventing his own 'whacky' theories when he can't understand how this work. -- Roger Hayter |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne" wrote in message
... "gareth" wrote in message ... 1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons, what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? Consider this. Waves and photons exist in visible light at any frequency. If the frequency is lowered below the visible spectrum all the way down to say, 1 MHz, at what point do the photons disappear? Or do they just get weak? Photons exist in visible light at MANY frequencies where such frequencies are generated by the transition of an electron to a lower energy orbit around an atom. What is the mechanism by which your photons at 1 MHz are created? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... You are making the same error as the village idiot. All EM radiation is the same in its nature. Terms like light and radio waves are simply labels we have applied to different parts of the EM spectrum. In part possibly because we didn't realise they were related, I can't recall the history. The village idiot's confusion is added to by him trying to mix simple Bohr models of the atom with more complex ones. Basically, he is out of his depth, as usual. He is forever trying to mix 'school book' physics with terms he has picked up but doesn't understand. When people try to help him, he abuses them, sometimes inventing his own 'whacky' theories when he can't understand how this work. Wayne left off my second question, which is well illustrated by what is quoted above ... 2. Are jimp and brian reay one and the same, because both monikers display the same incapability of engaging in well-socialised civil conversations, resorting to infantile abuse, and both refuse to be drawn whenever challenged on a technical matter? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
... I don't think he is! He is demonstrating by reductio ad absurdum that the photons *don't* disappear. That is wrong, for what I am asserting is that they don't appear in the first place in RF radiation from an antenna because the mechanism for their generation is not present. IMHO, it is possible for E-M radiation to be present in several amplitude modulations, the (Gaussian?) of a photon or the continuous envelope of a carrier wave. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
1. For those who suggest that RF transmissions are made up of photons, what is the amplitude envelope of each photon, and for how many cycles does it exist? A photon has only energy, which is equal to it's frequency times the Planck constant. There is no such thing as an "amplitude envelope" for a photon. 2. Are jimp and brian reay one and the same, because both monikers display the same incapability of engaging in well-socialised civil conversations, resorting to infantile abuse, and both refuse to be drawn whenever challenged on a technical matter? Your questions makes no sense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon -- Jim Pennino |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Do antennas radiate photons? | Antenna | |||
Photons | Antenna | |||
Photons | Antenna | |||
Minimum photons-per-second [amplitude] required for 150 KHz? | Antenna | |||
Minimum photons-per-second [amplitude] required for 150 KHz? | Shortwave |