On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth"
wrote:

Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the
congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in
a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile?

The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage
for you to act out your victim drama.

So why are you enabling?


Whether the responses are
sympathy, hostility, or technical doesn't matter because all you're
interested in is getting some attention, whether negative, positive,
or informative. Every single one of your postings have begun with a
personal insult, either to an individual or to the group, which seems
more appropriate to starting a bar room fight than a technical
discussion. You don't care about ham radio antennas because I suspect
you've never actually built or designed a working antenna.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_mentality
https://healthpsychologyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/the-victim-personality/

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

--

Rick

"rickman" wrote in message
...

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?


Why on earth would you wish to ignore discussions that may go beyond
the current limits of your understanding?

En el artículo , rickman
escribió:

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

Maybe you could take your own advice.

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")

On 9/15/2015 2:05 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , rickman
escribió:

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

Maybe you could take your own advice.

The posts I have been exchanging with Gareth have been civil and
technical, on both our parts. He did stop responding which is something
few of the argumentative posters have been able to achieve.

:P

--

Rick

"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/15/2015 2:05 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , rickman
escribió:

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

Maybe you could take your own advice.

The posts I have been exchanging with Gareth have been civil and
technical, on both our parts. He did stop responding which is something
few of the argumentative posters have been able to achieve.

I stopped responding because IMHO you were repeating matters aready
discussed (and disagreed)

On 9/15/2015 4:11 PM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/15/2015 2:05 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , rickman
escribió:

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

Maybe you could take your own advice.

The posts I have been exchanging with Gareth have been civil and
technical, on both our parts. He did stop responding which is something
few of the argumentative posters have been able to achieve.

I stopped responding because IMHO you were repeating matters aready
discussed (and disagreed)

Disagreed with perhaps, but not successfully argued against.

--

Rick

"rickman" wrote in message
...

Disagreed with perhaps, but not successfully argued against.

Thank-you for your sincere admission of defeat.

What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

YES!
As soon as someone responds to one of Gareth's posts the
fun begins. He starts a troll with an innocent question and
then goads the responders on and one. THE BEST SOLUTION IS
TO TOTALLY IGNORE HIM AND HIS POSTS.
MY 2 CENTS WORTH!

Irv VE6BP

"Irv Finkleman" wrote in message
...


What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

YES!
As soon as someone responds to one of Gareth's posts the
fun begins. He starts a troll with an innocent question and
then goads the responders on and one. THE BEST SOLUTION IS
TO TOTALLY IGNORE HIM AND HIS POSTS.
MY 2 CENTS WORTH!

That is completely untrue and I challenge you to put your money where
your mouth is and produce such a goad, for there are none whatsoever.

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Irv Finkleman" wrote in message
...


What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no?

YES!
As soon as someone responds to one of Gareth's posts the
fun begins. He starts a troll with an innocent question and
then goads the responders on and one. THE BEST SOLUTION IS
TO TOTALLY IGNORE HIM AND HIS POSTS.
MY 2 CENTS WORTH!

That is completely untrue and I challenge you to put your money where
your mouth is and produce such a goad, for there are none whatsoever.

Irv?

Hullo?

Are you there, OM?