Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
wrote in message
... Prove it. Show the tests and the results. Being as such bafflegab fodder does not exist, I shall not hold my breath waiting for such information. Even my cat knows there is no such thing as the tooth fairy. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 5:03:01 PM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
wrote in message ... Prove it. Show the tests and the results. Being as such bafflegab fodder does not exist, I shall not hold my breath waiting for such information. Even my cat knows there is no such thing as the tooth fairy. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Well, prove I'm a fool, you braying jackass. The ball is in your court. Show the tests, and the results which show a small antenna is an inefficient radiator. Until you do, you have no room to remind me of a damn thing. Thinking people all around the world have known for many years that even a small radiator will radiate nearly all power that is applied to it. So where does that leave you? In an isolated rubber room? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
wrote in message
... Well, prove I'm a fool, you braying jackass. The ball is in your court. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Over here in Brit, there is a glaring illustration of the abject failure of the new examination scheme, in the person of Stephen Thomas Cole. M0TEY, who had chosen his callsign as a memento of his days as a CBer. Cole is completely untechnical and all his posts (including those to this NG) are abusive and attention-seeking. You are indistinguishable from Cole. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
On Sunday, October 4, 2015 at 12:36:41 PM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
wrote in message ... Well, prove I'm a fool, you braying jackass. The ball is in your court. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Over here in Brit, there is a glaring illustration of the abject failure of the new examination scheme, in the person of Stephen Thomas Cole. M0TEY, who had chosen his callsign as a memento of his days as a CBer. Cole is completely untechnical and all his posts (including those to this NG) are abusive and attention-seeking. You are indistinguishable from Cole. That's because you have your head stuck up your differential, and your vision is totally obstructed. I'm still waiting for your silliness to provide the test results that prove a small radiator is an inefficient radiator. Every time I try to talk technical, you have a hissy fit and reply with personal abuse. You should be ashamed of yourself. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
wrote in message
... That's because you have your head stuck up your differential, and your vision is totally obstructed. I'm still waiting for your silliness to provide the test results that prove a small radiator is an inefficient radiator. Every time I try to talk technical, you have a hissy fit and reply with personal abuse. You should be ashamed of yourself. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Over here in Brit, there is a glaring illustration of the abject failure of the new examination scheme, in the person of Stephen Thomas Cole. M0TEY, who had chosen his callsign as a memento of his days as a CBer. Cole is completely untechnical and all his posts (including those to this NG) are abusive and attention-seeking. You are indistinguishable from Cole. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
"gareth" wrote:
wrote in message ... That's because you have your head stuck up your differential, and your vision is totally obstructed. I'm still waiting for your silliness to provide the test results that prove a small radiator is an inefficient radiator. Every time I try to talk technical, you have a hissy fit and reply with personal abuse. You should be ashamed of yourself. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Over here in Brit, there is a glaring illustration of the abject failure of the new examination scheme, in the person of Stephen Thomas Cole. M0TEY, who had chosen his callsign as a memento of his days as a CBer. Cole is completely untechnical and all his posts (including those to this NG) are abusive and attention-seeking. You are indistinguishable from Cole. Tell us again about that FT101 you blew up due to "pages missing from the manual", Gareth. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae are poor radiators - a simple illustration.
On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:36:38 +0100, gareth wrote:
Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Oh, the irony. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Short antennae, et al | Antenna | |||
short antennae | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna |