| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 5:03:01 PM UTC-5, gareth wrote:
wrote in message ... Prove it. Show the tests and the results. Being as such bafflegab fodder does not exist, I shall not hold my breath waiting for such information. Even my cat knows there is no such thing as the tooth fairy. Might I remind you that in your case the fool is better advised to keep his mouth shut rather then open it and confirm to all? Well, prove I'm a fool, you braying jackass. The ball is in your court. Show the tests, and the results which show a small antenna is an inefficient radiator. Until you do, you have no room to remind me of a damn thing. Thinking people all around the world have known for many years that even a small radiator will radiate nearly all power that is applied to it. So where does that leave you? In an isolated rubber room? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
| Short antennae, et al | Antenna | |||
| short antennae | Antenna | |||
| The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
| Short Antennae | Antenna | |||