Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: Paranoia. See: http://www.nonstopsystems.com/radio/frank_radio_antenna_magloop.htm There's quite a bit of useful info on building magnetic loops. One interesting comment was: UPDATE 24-Feb-2012: one and a half year after construction, I have used a professional milliohm meter (HP 4328A) to measure the DC-resistance of the copper parts of my loop (i.e., octagon + wires to the clamps): 3.2 milliohm. I also measured the resistance of a brand new round loop - without solder joints: also 3.2 milliohms. My joints are pretty good! However: I measured a DC-resistance of over 4 milliohm between the copper wires and the stainless steel clamps (i.e., 2 x 4 milliohms total). This kills the efficiency of the antenna - which I had already noticed over time. Must use a different method in my next design! I've seen the same thing with a loop I built (using an ESR meter to measure resistance). The DC resistance of mating parts is the same whether it's soldered, or just stuck together. In other words, the loop resistance doesn't change with soldering. So, what does the soldering do? One possibility is that it helps produce an unbroken surface area, which is useful when all the RF conduction is via skin effect. Unless there's some kind of dramatic change in element diameter, I don't see skin effect as a problem worthy of soldering. In short, all soldering and welding does is add some desperately needed mechanical rigidity. If a loop made from tubing and junctions is just "stuck together", it may have the same resistance as a one-piece loop initially. The tubing-to-joint connections typically involve enough scraping (an interference fit) to create a fresh metal-to-metal junction... nice low resistance. I strongly doubt that it'd remain so, after a year or so of exposure to air (and water and sun). Oxygen is going to infiltrate those contact surfaces and oxidize the metal; any sulphur vapor in the air will attack the surfaces as well. The quality of the connection will deteriorate and the resistance will climb. (Audiophiles who know their stuff will unplug and replug their signal cables periodically, to "wipe" the contact surfaces free of oxide and create a clean connection once again... RCA connectors are quite awful and this is one of their failure modes. An unplug/replug is far cheaper than buying the latest new overpriced "magic" cables at the boutique audio store, and works just as well!) I've seen plenty of antennas fail due to oxidizing and corroding connections. We had to completely rebuild the grounding-and-radials base of a Hustler G7-144 when the original interference-fit connections deteriorated after a decade up in the sun. A big benefit to soldering the joints, is that you'll seal the metal contact regions away from oxygen, and fill the gaps with a metal which is also a reasonably good conductor. Even if oxygen starts affecting the outer surface of the tube, there will still be solid metal beneath it. A similar problem with oxidation affects screwed-together "American Legion" J-pole antennas... they start generating intermod interference and broadband hash when transmitting. A dab of TIG-weld bead to bond the elements to the base eliminates the problem. You might get some of the same benefit by using an antioxidant paste on the joints when connecting them, but it wouldn't provide quite the same protection, and it wouldn't provide the mechanical strength you quite rightly point to as a benefit. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WWVH Transmitting Antennas for Time and Frequency | Shortwave | |||
beverage antennas for transmitting? | Antenna | |||
Loop Antennas | Antenna | |||
Had to fix my TS440SAT, cracked solder joints on a transistor | Homebrew | |||
PRO-2004 Dry Solder Joints | Scanner |