Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: Unfortunately, there's an alternative explanation for this phenomenon. When Garth started this thread, he had three newsgroups in the distribution: Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.homebrew However, when he replied to "Rambo" posting from one of these groups in: he deleted two of the groups leaving only rec.radio.amateur.antenna. This automatically limited his audience, prevented anyone in the other groups from replying, and may have made it appear that my presence caused everyone else to run away. In my case just the opposite occurred. Tired of reading nonsense from the other side of the Atlantic Ocean I built a filter for the obsolete but wonderful Mac newsreader MT-NewsWatcher which, when I read rec.radio.amateur.antenna, automatically sends anything cross-posted to uk.radio.amateur into the bit bucket. Some nights when I open MT-NewsWatcher there will appear to be maybe 15 articles in rraa but then there are instantaneously 0 articles when I open rraa within MT-NewsWatcher, and I know what has happened. But now that the uk.radio.amateur group has been deleted from the list of groups to which he posts when he posts to rraa, I'm seeing some of the nonsense once more. I guess I'll have to build a better filter. Keeping out some of the good stuff people like you post when you in addition reply to him in other posts (which I'd just as soon not see) will be a new challenge to my filter-building ability. There might be some good stuff in uk.radio.amateur too, and I'll have to see if I can build a filter so that I can read that in MT-NewsWatcher, minus of course things from a certain poster. David, VE7EZM and AF7BZ -- David Ryeburn To send e-mail, change "netz" to "net" |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Ryeburn wrote:
There might be some good stuff in uk.radio.amateur too, and I'll have to see if I can build a filter so that I can read that in MT-NewsWatcher, minus of course things from a certain poster. Alas, there is precious little useful or on-topic content posted to ukra. Filtering out troublesome posters and threads will remove around 99% of all messages. Of course, this is a poor position for a newsgroup to be in and few, if any, people are satisfied with the state of affairs. A proposal to create a moderated uk.* ham group was put forward recently and is currently being voted on. If you're interested, navigate to uk.net.news.config where you will find the RFD and ensuing discussion thread(s), plus the CFV with instructions on how to receive a ballot. Closing date is this Friday at midnight GMT, so hurry if you wish to vote! -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
En el artículo
et.hu, David Ryeburn escribió: There might be some good stuff in uk.radio.amateur too There isn't, I'm afraid. It's a cesspit, mainly as a result of the behaviour of the person you refer to. However, there is currently a discussion and a call for votes underway to create an alternative moderated group, uk.radio.amateur.moderated, which, if successful, will provide an alternative. The antics of the certain person that currently make uk.radio.amateur unusable won't be allowed in uk.r.a.moderated. cheers Mike -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Tomlinson" wrote in message
... My record in recent months, years, even has to been to speak up for the technical and gentlemanly traditions of amateur radio, and I institute several technical threads in pursuit of that aim, castigating offensive and infantile outbursts such as that of Tomlinson, as below. Tomlinson's record in recent weeks has been to foment the very cesspit against which he rails "The antics of the certain person that currently make uk.radio.amateur unusable won't be allowed in uk.r.a.moderated" is most clearly a self-referential remark by tomlinson that anyone who browses ura of recent weeks must surely agree with? En el artículo et.hu, David Ryeburn escribió: There might be some good stuff in uk.radio.amateur too There isn't, I'm afraid. It's a cesspit, mainly as a result of the behaviour of the person you refer to. However, there is currently a discussion and a call for votes underway to create an alternative moderated group, uk.radio.amateur.moderated, which, if successful, will provide an alternative. The antics of the certain person that currently make uk.radio.amateur unusable won't be allowed in uk.r.a.moderated. cheers Mike -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
High power tuning caps? | Homebrew |