Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There has been some discussion here on the pros and cons of BPL.
I thought I would through in my 2 cents worth... Why doesn't the FCC 'suggest' that cell phone and PCS companies install some type of WiFi node at every cell site in the country? A few questions on this: What percentage of homes have a computer? What percentage of those use the internet regularly? Of those, what percentage would use DSL or cable modem (if available)? If WiFi was available everywhere, how much would it have to cost in order to even break even? Jim N8EE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim"
Why doesn't the FCC 'suggest' that cell phone and PCS companies install some type of WiFi node at every cell site in the country? It's called Wi-Max (IEEE 802.16a) - it will have the range to do as you suggest and YES THEY WILL do exactly that without being asked by FCC. They're probably biting their nails waiting for Wi-Max to be 'actually available' as opposed to 'coming soon'. Probably two years - it'll move ~very fast~ once it is started. Wi-Fi doesn't have the range unless the user installs a very high gain antenna. Some cities are installing Wi-Fi into (almost) every lamp post. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
would use DSL or cable modem (if available)? If WiFi was available everywhere, how much would it have to cost in order to even break even? Jim N8EE About 15 dollars a month is what they are charging in Chaska MN, and that will allow them to maintain the current system as well as store a bit of cash for new equipment when they need it. The customer base was over 2000 last I knew, and 2 years ahead of what they expected. The charge includes everything including customer premise equipment. They are using 802.11b, and each customer gets approximately 1.5Mbps throughput, except for one of their coverage areas which they are having a problem with. That one still gets something like 500Kbps, which isn't bad. The billing is done through the city water bill, so it's quite convenient, I would guess. The equipment is Tropos, which we examined, and it is about as bulletproof as you can get. They (Tropos) use a Loctite type of substance on the 6dB gain omnis at the factory, so they don't leak or come loose. Seems excessive on an N connector, but definately thorough. They have heaters in them to keep them warm enough in the subzero winters. They can be mounted antennas up, or antennas down by reversing the outside case. And a nice touch is they use a sandwich plug for power that plugs in at the light sensor on a streetlight. Takes about as long to get the bucket truck in place as it does to mount and get it running. They need virtually no configuration on any individual unit. Runs as a mesh network; in their case, multiple mesh networks. And nope, I don't live there, but my company visited to see how they did it, etc. Don't have any affiliation with Tropos, either. We use the Motorola Canopy Product. Their web address is www.chaska.net tom K0TAR |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barb McBarb"
Some cities are installing Wi-Fi into (almost) every lamp post. "Tom Ring" ...Chaska MN... Chaska on CNN.com: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/int...ity/index.html |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
There has been some discussion here on the pros and cons of BPL. I thought I would through in my 2 cents worth... Why doesn't the FCC 'suggest' that cell phone and PCS companies install some type of WiFi node at every cell site in the country? Well, in FCC's defense, they have been too busy lately acting as the Christian Taliban morality ministry, so, you know... It's hard work. Doesn't leave much time for, oh say protecting the legitimate spectrum users from interference. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Alternative to BPL? | Antenna | |||
Dipole/Balun? Commercially Produced Alternative? | Antenna |