Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Painter wrote:
[...] Jack is absolutely right about grease being non-conductive! It only keeps air and moisture out of the areas where the metal is already touching. The same is true of the special conductive greases - the particles of metal provide the conductivity, and the grease only serves to seal around the contact surfaces. Let's drive a stake through this stupid urban myth. Vaseline (pure soft petroleum jelly) is a mixture of hydrocarbons, and is a very close relative of polyethylene, polypropylene, beeswax and other well-known insulators. Still don't believe it? Creak... stomp stomp stomp... medicine cabinet... jar of Vaseline... stomp stomp stomp... multimeter... 20 megohm range... test prods... WELL OF COURSE it's bloody non-conductive!!!!! Two touching greased surfaces still read 20M until you grind them together and force the grease out. And unless you DO force two greased metal surfaces together, they will be almost perfectly insulated from each other! [...] Just one further comment on Jack's posting: Because all transmitter antenna radials automatically become a part of the lightning protection system, the materials used should be the best you could afford, not the cheapest you can find. And the connections should likewise be the best possible. In principle that is correct, but heavy-duty radials are not cost-effective for ham installations, because there are so many of them (even in a small system). Also, heavy-duty radials are not necessary for the main purpose, which is RF grounding for normal operation. For a ham installation, it seems much more realistic to install enough ground rods to qualify as a lightning ground in their own right (as if there weren't any radials at all). Then you can treat the radials as being purely for RF grounding. They will of course contribute to lightning grounding, but you don't have to rely on them for that purpose. We're moving house, so I am just about to tear up the radial system here - and also pull out the 8ft ground rod that goes 5-6ft into groundwater. The next QTH will have much more space, so this discussion comes at just the right time. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
Performance of a system of Ground Radials | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
ground radials? | Antenna |