Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 12th 05, 04:39 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Prometheus wrote:
I smell some faulty logic, just because "No tumors were associated with
less than 10 years of cellphone use" you can not infer that tumours
should be associated with more than ten years use.


People with less than 10 years of cellphone use suffered the same
rate of tumors as non-cellphone users. People with more than 10 years
of cellphone use suffered twice as many tumors as non-cellphone users
and tumors among cellphone users was four times more likely to occur
on the side of the head normally used for the cellphone. Where's the
faulty logic?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mobile phone in hard environment Rocco Antenna 16 January 17th 04 06:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017