Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howard wrote:
Forget the discone, it will work - though I can't say any better than the two antennas mentioned - but what you gain in reduced footprint is lost in the discone being taller. Also, you can expect to spend more for the discone. If I can fit it in my attic *and* eliminate the need to have two antennas (TV and FM), I am willing to spend the extra cost (up to $100). I get most of the TV stations that I want through basic cable service. There are two local TV stations that I receive very well with a simple rabbit ear antenna (came with the TV), so my requirements from a TV antenna are not very high. I guess the only questions I have regarding the discone antenna a 1) Are there any issues in regard to wave polarization? Is it true that both TV and FM broadcasts are polarized both vertically and horizontally? 2) How does one match between that about 50 ohms antenna impedance and the cable's 75 ohm impedance? FWIW, I put up the Radio Shack crossed dipole antenna at a friend's cabin and it took him from getting no FM reception to two stations. Okay, not an "FM DX antenna" but consider that he is 40 miles from any town of significance, the cabin is in a valley and there are taller mountains between him and anything else. Yes, that is exactly the kind of result I want to achieve. I know there is no magical solution that defies the laws of physics (50% signal loss when placed in the attic, size, etc.) such as the "bogus antennas" described he http://www.kyes.com/antenna/antennat...ennatypes.html Good luck, Howard Thank you very much! Lynn |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Linux Lover" wrote in message
... Howard wrote: Forget the discone, it will work - though I can't say any better than the two antennas mentioned - but what you gain in reduced footprint is lost in the discone being taller. Also, you can expect to spend more for the discone. If I can fit it in my attic *and* eliminate the need to have two antennas (TV and FM), I am willing to spend the extra cost (up to $100). I get most of the TV stations that I want through basic cable service. There are two local TV stations that I receive very well with a simple rabbit ear antenna (came with the TV), so my requirements from a TV antenna are not very high. Lynn - This really gets to the heart of your design and selection question. From your location you need to determine the bearings 0 to 359 (with North at 0/360 and E at 90 degrees), where the FM (or TV stations) transmitting antennas are. Geography and population density usually "clump" these large transmitting towers in a small area. (Chicago - Sears and Hancock skyscrapers; New York - Empire State Building and Palisades (NJ)) The layout of these transmitting antennas in a 60 mile radius will help you select the ideal antenna pattern for your location. Instead of an omni, you may be able to use a beam, if all of the stations (that you really wish to listen to) are in a 30 degree or less spread. Greg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |