Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howard wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 23:25:12 -0800, "Harbin" wrote: Howdy Y'all: Chushcraft says that the Ringo Ranger II is the latest design featuring three 5/8 wave radiating elements and an adjustable 1/8 wave phasing stub. My question is why a 1/8 phasing stub? Should it be more like 3/8 or somthing, and why only one phasing stub, should there not be 2? And is the outside of the coax that comes from the ground plane a radiating element? This antenna has me scratching my head, any ideas? Harbin Sounds like marketing in action; I'd call it a two element colinear with a decoupling section at the bottom. It's a decent enough antenna but the real marketing hype lies in the claim that those three lame whiskers which protrude from the base of the thing act as "decoupling sections". Which don't work worth a hill of beans in their advertised role *particularly* with this antenna which is notorious for tossing RF back into le shack. The way to actually clean up a Ringo II and get it cooking properly is to install an RF choke wound, beaded or otherwise near the feedpoint. Just for giggles, what gain does Witchcraft claim? Howard w3rv |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARX2B Ringo Ranger | Antenna | |||
Cushcraft Ringo Ranger II | Antenna |