Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:25:32 -0800, Jim Kelley wrote: A circulator, being in general a three (or four) port directional device, might have some trouble buying into that logic. ;-) The crux of the phenomenological problem is that power does not flow or move, nor is it something that is reflected. Hi Jim, I merely responded in like metaphors. I had a hunch about that. But I can't always parse your sentences into the form of a concrete idea. Usually an interesting read though. ;-) To this point, the meditation of the difference between Bob's results and the ARRL table speculates that the ARRL used an unknown Intel 100W circulating Signal Generator driving 1 second's worth of transmission line where Poynters Theorem proves that the dB loss is - well, we never get to the end, do we? That's absolutely right. Not all of us do. When some of us have a question about something, we respond by flinging poison tipped daggers at those who, in the persuit of a common interest, try to help us achieve a more cogent understanding. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy - new measurement | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna |