Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:19:12 +0000, Ian Jackson
wrote: What works better? Hi Ian, In following up the links that you provided, there is a superior reference found at the same site: http://www.minicircuits.com/appnote/an70001.pdf which in turn leads to a treasure trove on the topic that supports my favorite discussion on Mismatch Uncertainty. By following the links, they offer you articles and software to compute the accumulation of errors (and loss) found in mismatched sources looking at mismatched loads. A notable quote: "A fixed attenuator can help to lower the VSWR of cascaded (connected) components by providing isolation between the impedances, effectively masking the impedance mismatches." For both mismatched source and load, one handy shortcut offered is that the system suffers a SWR that is not the aggregation of the two, but the multiple of the two. This is not particularly significant for a source SWR of 2 seeing a load SWR of 2 (same result of 4 for either addition or multiplication), but above this value and loss begins to climb dramatically. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
please need help with delta loop antenna better matching system than gamma match | Antenna | |||
Clemens match modelling | Antenna | |||
Problem with Gamma Match? | Antenna | |||
Gamma match question 6-meter yagi | Antenna | |||
Gamma match: Inherently inferior to balanced match systems? | Antenna |