Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Mr. Roy Lewallen,
Thank you very much for the details. Now, I would like to acknowledge that after a one-by-one symbol comparison I made between the two power formulas, the one corrected by you and the mine, I discovered, beyond to be equivalent, a fact which was lacked my attention, since I had packed the two phase factors, in the _notorious_ third term, under a common symbol td. Namely, following your symbolization for convenience, we have From the 2nd article by you | ... | UP = fop - rap + (|fee|^2 / |Z0|) * rhea * exp(-ax) * | 2 * sin(box - 2 * phi) * sin(delta) | ... | and in conjunction with the 1st article by you | ... | Interestingly, the right hand term also goes to zero when | box - 2 * psi = n * 180, where n is any integer including zero. | That means that, | even when Z0 is complex, the average total power will be the | difference between fP and rP at particular points along the line, or at | the input end of particular line lengths. | ... we can conclude that this is a most interesting correct result, indeed. But I am afraid this difference has its chances to be a negative number. And if this is the case then, as we can see, we are running in big troubles... Sincerely yours, pez SV7BAX P.S. Please remember to send me the lossless case. I look forward for it. | Roy Lewallen wrote: | ... | You've been the only one to show any interest so far. If one other | person requests it, I'll post it. Otherwise, I'll email it to you. | ... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna |