| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
September 3rd 03, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
William E. Sabin wrote:
4) The determination that rho magnitude in a transmission line can be greater than 1.0 is correct. In a passively loaded line fed by an oscillator, where there is no positive feedback from load to oscillator, there is no problem about a rho magnitude greater than 1.0. But can |rho|=Sqrt(Pref/Pfwd) ever be greater than 1.0 for a passive load? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
