Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Holy mackrel, Mr. Science!
But gee, you can see that from even a casual glance at the equations you'll find in virtually any transmission line text. It's kind of like saying that wow, Terman concludes that resistance is voltage divided by current, so now we can believe it too. People who believe that SWR is affected by source impedance have either rejected established theory, or don't have the background or interest to read and understand what we consider to be very simple equations. So I'd hardly expect them to be impressed by someone pointing out what the equations and established theory say clearly and unambigously. You can't fight Ouija boards with math. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: It's hard to imagine how Rs (Zs) could have any effect on that ratio. Here's an interesting quote from _Transmission_Lines_, by Chipman, page 175: "Equation (8.27) demonstrates explicitly that the shape of a standing wave pattern representing |V(d)| as a function of d on a transmission line is in no way affected by the quantities, Vs, Zs, and rho(s) at the source." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|