Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:16:13 -0500, 'Doc wrote:
I'm sorry Stefano, until there is documented proof from a reliable source, presented in a straight forward manner, my credulity meter will stay stuck on 'B.S.'... 'Doc Hi Doc, The documentation is there, it is in the appendix no one reads (especially Stefano). It shows quite distinctly how this antenna goes straight into the toilet out beyond line of sight (that should show some change in the Neilsens for an AM station). Somewhere between -10 and -30dB compared to the standard quarterwave antenna. It shows up clear as a bell on the charts (the test engineer drew the FCC standard in RED and the test data plunges like a russian submarine). They could use this stuff in the economics department of an University class in how to kill business without really trying. Of course the introductory material reads like the Playboy After Dark advisor. They used the line of sight numbers to show that the best numbers for the eh equaled the worst field readings the FCC considered allowable. In other (their) words "just as efficient or better." P.T. Barnum showed more class when he fleeced suckers. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
Compact HF antenna (RX-only) for reference in antenna tests? | Antenna | |||
Off Center Fed Dipole: Windom HSQ | Antenna | |||
Mobile Antenna Question | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |