Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"'Doc" wrote in message ...
"G.Beat", You might take a very close look at the quoted articles. I think you will find that neither antenna is as much of a 'dog' as they are made out to be, and that there are distinctions that have very little practical meaning. And no matter who wrote the articles, you should be aware of the intended audience... 'Doc The purpose of the web site reference is for the reader to understand how the antennas are constructed. I have no opinion on either antenna ... your reference of 'dog' and 'intended audience' is non sequitur w9gb non sequitur ['n?n 's?kwit?] noun 1 a statement having little or no relevance to what preceded it 2 (Logic) a conclusion that does not follow from the premises Abbrev.: non seq [ETYMOLOGY: Latin, literally: it does not follow] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rockwell Collins "PropMan 2000" propagation s/w | Antenna | |||
Rockwell-Collins PropMan 2000 - solution for issues with internet space wx data retrieval | Antenna |